Comparison Overview

Kampus Klothes

VS

Dome Printing

Kampus Klothes

164 Railroad Dr, Ivyland, Pennsylvania, 18974, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Kampus Klothes has been family owned and operated since 1984. The founder, Tom Gonsiewski, was originally a school teacher and started screen printing as a side business in his basement. As the company quickly experienced exponential growth, Tom and Mary Gonsiewski (President) developed Kampus Klothes into the company that it is today. ​ We are complete team outfitters and all of our screen-printing and embroidering is done on site. We care deeply for our customers and promise to continue providing quality goods at extremely competitive prices. Our turn around rate to completely process an order is one of the quickest in the business. Whether your team is on the field or in the corporate world, we can provide you with the uniform that identifies you as a winner.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dome Printing

2031 Optisolar Ln, McClellan, 95652, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Since 1969, Dome Printing has functioned as a family-owned manufacturing organization offering high-quality printing to the northern California business community. Today, Dome continues our tradition of being a family-owned business under the leadership of Tim and Robert Poole. Dome is a market leader nationally and is respected highly among our peers for our innovation and progressive approach to printing solutions. “We define our success by how we are perceived by our peers, customers, vendors, and employees,” says Tim Poole. “We want people to say that the Poole brothers do the right thing; that we offer a quality product, take care of our customers, treat our employees like family, and give back to our community.”

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kampus-klothes-inc.jpeg
Kampus Klothes
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dome-printing.jpeg
Dome Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kampus Klothes
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dome Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kampus Klothes in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dome Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Kampus Klothes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kampus Klothes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dome Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dome Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kampus-klothes-inc.jpeg
Kampus Klothes
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dome-printing.jpeg
Dome Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kampus Klothes company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dome Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dome Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kampus Klothes company.

In the current year, Dome Printing company and Kampus Klothes company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dome Printing company nor Kampus Klothes company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dome Printing company nor Kampus Klothes company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dome Printing company nor Kampus Klothes company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kampus Klothes company nor Dome Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kampus Klothes nor Dome Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kampus Klothes company nor Dome Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dome Printing company employs more people globally than Kampus Klothes company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Kampus Klothes nor Dome Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kampus Klothes nor Dome Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kampus Klothes nor Dome Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kampus Klothes nor Dome Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kampus Klothes nor Dome Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kampus Klothes nor Dome Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N