Comparison Overview

Kaiser PLLC

VS

Gilson Gray LLP

Kaiser PLLC

1401 K Street NW, Washington, DC, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Kaiser PLLC is a white-collar boutique in Washington D.C. We represent individuals and companies in government investigations, white-collar criminal cases, and complex civil litigation. Our attorneys have experience at some of the most prestigious law firms in the country, and in the courtroom. We offer outstanding performance and service at rates which are highly competitive. Please visit our webpage at http://www.kaiserlaw.com for more information about our practice.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gilson Gray LLP

29 Rutland Square, Edinburgh, undefined, EH1 2BW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Gilson Gray is a full service law firm with offices in Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen, Dundee, North Berwick and Lincoln. Gilson Gray offers specialist legal, property and financial* services. We have risen to be one of Scotland’s most prominent law firms. And we’ve done this by being different. Our partner led teams include accredited specialists and award winning individuals, focused on you and your goal. We harness a team of highly skilled, qualified, professionals representing every aspect of law, to come together to achieve what you need to get done. Many of our lawyers are dual qualified in both Scottish and English law. Please contact us to find out why. Twitter: @GilsonGray Facebook: Gilson Gray LLP Instagram: gilsongray

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 274
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kaiserdillon-pllc.jpeg
Kaiser PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gilson-gray-llp.jpeg
Gilson Gray LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kaiser PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gilson Gray LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kaiser PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gilson Gray LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Kaiser PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kaiser PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gilson Gray LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gilson Gray LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kaiserdillon-pllc.jpeg
Kaiser PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gilson-gray-llp.jpeg
Gilson Gray LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gilson Gray LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kaiser PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gilson Gray LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kaiser PLLC company.

In the current year, Gilson Gray LLP company and Kaiser PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gilson Gray LLP company nor Kaiser PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gilson Gray LLP company nor Kaiser PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gilson Gray LLP company nor Kaiser PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kaiser PLLC company nor Gilson Gray LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kaiser PLLC nor Gilson Gray LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gilson Gray LLP company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kaiser PLLC company.

Gilson Gray LLP company employs more people globally than Kaiser PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Kaiser PLLC nor Gilson Gray LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kaiser PLLC nor Gilson Gray LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kaiser PLLC nor Gilson Gray LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kaiser PLLC nor Gilson Gray LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kaiser PLLC nor Gilson Gray LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kaiser PLLC nor Gilson Gray LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X