Comparison Overview

Kaiser Permanente

VS

Philips

Kaiser Permanente

1 Kaiser Plaza, Oakland, California, US, 94612
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 0 and 549

At the heart of health care, you’ll find Kaiser Permanente. As the nation’s leading not-for-profit, integrated health plan, we make a difference in the lives of members, patients, and communities across the country. With 39 hospitals and more than 734 locations in eight states and the District of Columbia, we proudly serve more than 12.7 million members from coast to coast. Whether you choose to join a hospital in the Northwest, a clinic in Southern California, or a medical office in the Mid-Atlantic, we have many opportunities for you to shape the future of care. Our teams are empowered to advance impactful and extraordinary care for all by pioneering health outcomes, encouraging diverse viewpoints, and creating new opportunities for learning and advancement. This covers more than our members and our employees; it also reaches far into our communities. Together, we’re proudly working as one for a healthier today and tomorrow. *Disclaimer: Please do not include any medical, personal, or confidential information in your comments. Comments are encouraged; however, Kaiser Permanente reserves the right to moderate comments on this page as necessary to prevent medical, personal, and confidential information from being posted on this site. In addition, Kaiser Permanente will remove all spam, personal attacks, profanity, and off-topic commentary. Comments containing advertisements about goods or services or announcements about news or events that are not related to Kaiser Permanente will be removed. Please note that your communications with Kaiser Permanente through this page are informal and are not part of Kaiser Permanente’s formal grievance process for members. To get information about the member grievance process or to submit a grievance, go to http://k-p.li/2aToRTn

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 132,061
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
14
Attack type number
2

Philips

Amstelplein 2, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, NL, 1096 BC
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Over the past decade we have transformed into a focused leader in health technology. At Philips, our purpose is to improve people’s health and well-being through meaningful innovation. We aim to improve 2.5 billion lives per year by 2030, including 400 million in underserved communities. We see healthcare as a connected whole. Helping people to live healthily and prevent disease. Giving clinicians the tools they need to make a precision diagnosis and deliver personalized treatment. Aiding the patient's recovery at home in the community. All supported by a seamless flow of data. As a technology company, we – and our brand licensees – innovate for people with one consistent belief: there’s always a way to make life better. Visit our website: http://www.philips.com/ Follow our social media house rules https://www.philips.com/a-w/about-philips/social-media.html

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 65,228
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kaiser-permanente.jpeg
Kaiser Permanente
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philips.jpeg
Philips
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kaiser Permanente
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Philips
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kaiser Permanente in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Philips in 2025.

Incident History — Kaiser Permanente (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kaiser Permanente cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Philips (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philips cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kaiser-permanente.jpeg
Kaiser Permanente
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized data sharing through tracking code
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat (Inappropriate Access by Workforce Member)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philips.jpeg
Philips
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Philips company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kaiser Permanente company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Kaiser Permanente company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Philips company.

In the current year, Philips company and Kaiser Permanente company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Philips company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Kaiser Permanente company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Kaiser Permanente company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Philips company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Philips company nor Kaiser Permanente company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kaiser Permanente company nor Philips company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Philips holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Philips company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kaiser Permanente company.

Kaiser Permanente company employs more people globally than Philips company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Philips holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Philips holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Philips holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Philips holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Philips holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Philips holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N