Comparison Overview

Kabo Lawyers

VS

Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C.

Kabo Lawyers

Level 5, 100 Collins Street, Melbourne, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

With over a decade of experience in cross-culture international communications, Kabo Lawyers is a boutique law firm that focuses on facilitating and providing fully integrated legal services to meet the needs of individuals and businesses from both the local and emerging Asian markets. Composed of lawyers from multiple countries with expertise in various areas of Australian law, our firm is especially capable of merging an Australian legal perspective with the multifaceted cultural perceptions of our Asian and Australian clientele. At Kabo Lawyers, we combine our understanding of the Australian legal landscape with our knowledge of the inherent cultural sensitivities of Asian societies to translate and interpret complex legal situations into equivalents that are easily understandable to clients of various backgrounds. We seek to assist our clients with achieving their desired results, priding ourselves on providing personalised and tailored advice that caters to the distinctive character of each client. For us, every case is unique, and we make an effect to develop close relationships with our clients in order to provide optimal service. To us, we believe that there is no compromise for the best, and you can expect nothing less.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C.

US, 02038
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

For over 20 years, the lawyers of Gilmore, Rees and Carlson, P.C., have worked with individuals, families and business owners to effectively resolve the issues they face today and to plan for the future. With one of the largest trust and estate departments in New England, and accompanying real estate and litigation capabilities, the firm delivers expertise one would normally find only in a large downtown firm in the convenience of the suburbs. Learn how the counselors of Gilmore, Rees and Carlson, P.C., can address your legal needs and bring you peace of mind.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kabo-lawyers.jpeg
Kabo Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kabo Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kabo Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — Kabo Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kabo Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kabo-lawyers.jpeg
Kabo Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C.
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Kabo Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Kabo Lawyers company has not reported any.

In the current year, Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. company and Kabo Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. company nor Kabo Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Kabo Lawyers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. company nor Kabo Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kabo Lawyers company nor Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kabo Lawyers nor Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kabo Lawyers company nor Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. company employs more people globally than Kabo Lawyers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Kabo Lawyers nor Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kabo Lawyers nor Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kabo Lawyers nor Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kabo Lawyers nor Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kabo Lawyers nor Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kabo Lawyers nor Gilmore, Rees & Carlson, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X