Comparison Overview

KA Filing

VS

Brady & Kosofsky, PA

KA Filing

Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

KA Filing is your one stop solution for all your Global Intellectual Property (IP) Filing needs in cost effective manner. We present an attorney created and managed platform and are not just an ecommerce site developer. Your IP filing requests are checked and reviewed by IP professionals, adding more credence to your patent prosecution and TM registrations. We have been providing IP filing and prosecution services for over a decade and understand the Technical Nuances and Legal Criticalities of the field. The most important aspect of our offering is that our job doesn’t end with filing but begins with it. Having a team of US, CHINA, INDIA AND CANADIAN IP attorney strengthen our effort to provide small clients and solo inventor the best way to file and prosecute their IP Assets Globally. We understand the importance of step-by-step guidance and have been holding hands with many of our clients through the entire process, helping them overcome objections/rejections, and sometimes even after grant/registration. Through our experience, we present a more streamlined and modular approach to all IP matters, involving clients of all sizes. If you need any help on legal or techno-legal fronts, you are at the right place and in safe hands. We believe in charging only for tasks that involve knowledge and acumen, thereby offering significant reduction in overall costs globally.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brady & Kosofsky, PA

13925 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

BK Law provides Title, Settlement, and Closing services in the Attorney Closing States of North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. Brady & Kosofsky, PA is a forward-thinking real estate law firm with a focus on delivering exceptional consumer experiences while navigating complex legal and compliance landscapes. Founded in 2008 during the mortgage crisis, the firm quickly earned a reputation for its innovative approach to real estate transactions, closings, and title services. Serving clients in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, Brady & Kosofsky has consistently remained on the cutting edge of industry developments. With a deep commitment to compliance, the firm has been a leader in adapting to new legislation, including eClosings and remote electronic notarization. Our team of experienced attorneys and professionals ensures smooth, efficient, and secure real estate transactions, tailored to meet the evolving needs of the modern market. Our team is experienced and active in the Residential and Commercial Title and Closing Industry. We provide services in Residential Closings, Investor Closings and Transactions, REO Title and Settlement, Relocation, Institutional Investors, Hedge Funds, Private Lenders, and Title Insurance Underwriters.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ka-filing.jpeg
KA Filing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brady-&-kosofsky-pa.jpeg
Brady & Kosofsky, PA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KA Filing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brady & Kosofsky, PA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KA Filing in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brady & Kosofsky, PA in 2025.

Incident History — KA Filing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KA Filing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brady & Kosofsky, PA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brady & Kosofsky, PA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ka-filing.jpeg
KA Filing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brady-&-kosofsky-pa.jpeg
Brady & Kosofsky, PA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Brady & Kosofsky, PA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KA Filing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Brady & Kosofsky, PA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to KA Filing company.

In the current year, Brady & Kosofsky, PA company and KA Filing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brady & Kosofsky, PA company nor KA Filing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brady & Kosofsky, PA company nor KA Filing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brady & Kosofsky, PA company nor KA Filing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KA Filing company nor Brady & Kosofsky, PA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KA Filing nor Brady & Kosofsky, PA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither KA Filing company nor Brady & Kosofsky, PA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Brady & Kosofsky, PA company employs more people globally than KA Filing company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither KA Filing nor Brady & Kosofsky, PA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KA Filing nor Brady & Kosofsky, PA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KA Filing nor Brady & Kosofsky, PA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KA Filing nor Brady & Kosofsky, PA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KA Filing nor Brady & Kosofsky, PA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KA Filing nor Brady & Kosofsky, PA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X