Comparison Overview

JVL

VS

Eldorado Scioto Downs

JVL

1395 Morningside Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M1B 3J1, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Established 38 years ago, JVL is a fully-integrated engineering gaming and amusement game manufacturer. With a diverse product line of video slot machines, amusement, and home equipment, JVL prides itself on presenting solution-based entertainment technology for a broad market. The company's foundation is built on innovative technology, creativity, hard work, and respect for its customers and employees. JVL is proud to be a leader in the gaming and slot machine manufacturing industry.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 184
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Eldorado Scioto Downs

Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Experience the thrill of gaming and the exhilaration of live harness racing together in one place! Thrills await you at Columbus, Ohio’s total entertainment destination. With over 2,200 of the most popular games spread out over a spacious and comfortable gaming floor, you’re sure to find the game for you! Monopoly, Quick Hits, Lightning Link and Wheel of Fortune are just a few of the exciting game themes waiting for you at Eldorado Gaming Scioto Downs! Open 24-hours a day, seven-days a week, our gaming floor caters to every level of player — from Penny to High Limit action.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 149
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jvl-corporation.jpeg
JVL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scioto-downs.jpeg
Eldorado Scioto Downs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JVL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eldorado Scioto Downs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JVL in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eldorado Scioto Downs in 2025.

Incident History — JVL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JVL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eldorado Scioto Downs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eldorado Scioto Downs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jvl-corporation.jpeg
JVL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scioto-downs.jpeg
Eldorado Scioto Downs
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Attack on IT support vendor
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party IT vendor breach
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Eldorado Scioto Downs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JVL company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Eldorado Scioto Downs company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas JVL company has not reported any.

In the current year, Eldorado Scioto Downs company and JVL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eldorado Scioto Downs company nor JVL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Eldorado Scioto Downs company has disclosed at least one data breach, while JVL company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Eldorado Scioto Downs company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while JVL company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither JVL company nor Eldorado Scioto Downs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JVL nor Eldorado Scioto Downs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Eldorado Scioto Downs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to JVL company.

JVL company employs more people globally than Eldorado Scioto Downs company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither JVL nor Eldorado Scioto Downs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JVL nor Eldorado Scioto Downs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JVL nor Eldorado Scioto Downs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JVL nor Eldorado Scioto Downs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JVL nor Eldorado Scioto Downs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JVL nor Eldorado Scioto Downs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H