Comparison Overview

JustRight Scotland

VS

Gulf Region Advocacy Center

JustRight Scotland

111 Union Street, Glasgow, Scotland, G1 3TA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We are Scotland’s legal centre for justice and human rights. We collaborate with our partners to reduce inequality and discrimination, and help others use the law as a tool to achieve social justice. We do this by providing legal services directly to individuals, through our three centres of legal excellence (the Scottish Refugee and Migrant Centre, the Scottish Women's Rights Centre and the Anti-Trafficking and Exploitation Centre) as well as working through JustRight for All, our legal policy, research and training hub.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gulf Region Advocacy Center

77007, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Gulf Region Advocacy Center, or GRACE, is an independent, client-centered, Houston-based charity that provides high quality capital defense to indigents facing the death penalty at trial or retrial. Beginning with our life-saving representation of Calvin “sleeping lawyer” Burdine when he returned to Harris County in 2002 for retrial, to the dramatic life verdict in the 2008 jury trial of Juan Quintero Perez for murder of a police officer, GRACE has relied upon private donations and volunteer labor to bring the methodologies of successful capital defense offices around the country to bear in the bloodiest courthouse in America.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/justrightscotland.jpeg
JustRight Scotland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Gulf Region Advocacy Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JustRight Scotland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gulf Region Advocacy Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JustRight Scotland in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gulf Region Advocacy Center in 2025.

Incident History — JustRight Scotland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JustRight Scotland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gulf Region Advocacy Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gulf Region Advocacy Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/justrightscotland.jpeg
JustRight Scotland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Gulf Region Advocacy Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gulf Region Advocacy Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JustRight Scotland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gulf Region Advocacy Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JustRight Scotland company.

In the current year, Gulf Region Advocacy Center company and JustRight Scotland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gulf Region Advocacy Center company nor JustRight Scotland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gulf Region Advocacy Center company nor JustRight Scotland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gulf Region Advocacy Center company nor JustRight Scotland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JustRight Scotland company nor Gulf Region Advocacy Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JustRight Scotland nor Gulf Region Advocacy Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither JustRight Scotland company nor Gulf Region Advocacy Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

JustRight Scotland company employs more people globally than Gulf Region Advocacy Center company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither JustRight Scotland nor Gulf Region Advocacy Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JustRight Scotland nor Gulf Region Advocacy Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JustRight Scotland nor Gulf Region Advocacy Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JustRight Scotland nor Gulf Region Advocacy Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JustRight Scotland nor Gulf Region Advocacy Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JustRight Scotland nor Gulf Region Advocacy Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X