Comparison Overview

Justicia Lab

VS

GLENLAKE paralegal

Justicia Lab

New York, 10001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 700 and 749

Justicia Lab is Pro Bono Net’s immigrant justice technology lab, and a nonprofit legal tech initiative whose mission is to transform immigrant justice through collaboration, creativity, and technology. We work hand in hand with immigrants and their advocates to identify common challenges and incubate scalable digital tools to advance help immigrants navigate our immigration system, find workplace justice, and more. Our tools prioritize collaborative and equitable design, data privacy, and language justice and provide critical resources and capacity to where they’re needed the most.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GLENLAKE paralegal

325 Welland Avenue, St. Catharines, ONTARIO, L2R 2R2, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Glenlake Paralegal provides legal services to small business and individuals who are looking for an advocate that can deliver results. When you want an advocate, you need a great communicator – and that’s why you want Glenlake Paralegal Services. Glenlake Paralegal is not a high volume outfit. We do not specialize in Highway Traffic Act. We are a small business whose clientele benefits from our world of experience. We are a small business that understands the needs of other small business owners. We at Glenlake Paralegal Services take a proactive approach to your problem. We don’t think the legal system should be inaccessible, or that you should have to pay a great deal to get justice. When we first sit down with you, at our free, initial consultation, Glenlake will work hard to understand what your issue really is, how we can solve it, and make a plan on how to resolve it. We understand you, and we are going to make the court understand you too.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/justicialab.jpeg
Justicia Lab
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glenlake-paralegal.jpeg
GLENLAKE paralegal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Justicia Lab
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GLENLAKE paralegal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Justicia Lab in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GLENLAKE paralegal in 2025.

Incident History — Justicia Lab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Justicia Lab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GLENLAKE paralegal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GLENLAKE paralegal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/justicialab.jpeg
Justicia Lab
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glenlake-paralegal.jpeg
GLENLAKE paralegal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GLENLAKE paralegal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Justicia Lab company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GLENLAKE paralegal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Justicia Lab company.

In the current year, GLENLAKE paralegal company and Justicia Lab company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GLENLAKE paralegal company nor Justicia Lab company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GLENLAKE paralegal company nor Justicia Lab company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GLENLAKE paralegal company nor Justicia Lab company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Justicia Lab company nor GLENLAKE paralegal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Justicia Lab nor GLENLAKE paralegal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Justicia Lab company nor GLENLAKE paralegal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Justicia Lab company employs more people globally than GLENLAKE paralegal company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Justicia Lab nor GLENLAKE paralegal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Justicia Lab nor GLENLAKE paralegal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Justicia Lab nor GLENLAKE paralegal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Justicia Lab nor GLENLAKE paralegal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Justicia Lab nor GLENLAKE paralegal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Justicia Lab nor GLENLAKE paralegal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X