Comparison Overview

Justice North

VS

Jenkins & Kling, P.C.

Justice North

230 W Superior St, Suite 200, Duluth, Minnesota, US, 55802
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Justice North is a nonprofit civil legal aid law firm dedicated to the principle that equal access to justice is a basic human right, regardless of background or circumstances. We open the doors of the justice system to the most vulnerable in our communities by providing critical legal assistance to preserve our clients’ safety, security, and stability. Justice North provides representation, limited services, advice, or information to individuals with issues that fall outside of the criminal justice system. For people facing civil legal challenges such as the threat of losing their home, safety, health care, income, or even their families, navigating the justice system without a lawyer can be nearly impossible. Justice North was formerly known as Legal Aid Service of Northeastern Minnesota (LASNEM). Justice North serves Aitkin, Carlton, Cass, Cook, Crow Wing, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Pine, and St. Louis Counties. Justice North’s offices are located in Brainerd, Duluth, Grand Rapids, Pine City, and Virginia.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jenkins & Kling, P.C.

150 North Meramec Avenue, Suite 400, St. Louis, Missouri, 63105, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The attorneys in our firm are counselors and advocates, with areas of emphasis extending from simple corporate and litigation matters to complex commercial litigation and sophisticated corporate, real estate and land use issues, bankruptcy and banking transactions. We also offer legal counsel services in the areas of estate planning and probate practice. Jenkins & Kling, P.C. takes pride in our expertise and we deliver only the highest quality of legal services to our clients. Our attorneys are mature, talented individuals who emphasize a practical approach to aggressive counseling and advocacy.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/justicenorthmn.jpeg
Justice North
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jenkins-&-kling-p-c-.jpeg
Jenkins & Kling, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Justice North
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jenkins & Kling, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Justice North in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jenkins & Kling, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — Justice North (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Justice North cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jenkins & Kling, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jenkins & Kling, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/justicenorthmn.jpeg
Justice North
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jenkins-&-kling-p-c-.jpeg
Jenkins & Kling, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jenkins & Kling, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Justice North company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jenkins & Kling, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Justice North company.

In the current year, Jenkins & Kling, P.C. company and Justice North company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jenkins & Kling, P.C. company nor Justice North company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jenkins & Kling, P.C. company nor Justice North company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jenkins & Kling, P.C. company nor Justice North company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Justice North company nor Jenkins & Kling, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Justice North nor Jenkins & Kling, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Justice North company nor Jenkins & Kling, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Justice North company employs more people globally than Jenkins & Kling, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Justice North nor Jenkins & Kling, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Justice North nor Jenkins & Kling, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Justice North nor Jenkins & Kling, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Justice North nor Jenkins & Kling, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Justice North nor Jenkins & Kling, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Justice North nor Jenkins & Kling, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X