Comparison Overview

Justice at Work

VS

Doyle & Seelbach PLLC

Justice at Work

33 Harrison Ave., Boston, 02111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Justice at Work’s mission is to support workers in low-wage jobs in exercising their power. We strengthen organizing by providing labor-and-employment legal services, training, and strategic guidance to workers’ organizations. Justice At Work envisions all people exercising their power at work to ensure fair pay, safety, and dignity. To accomplish our vision, we: a) build capacity through legal training/education and technical assistance; b) provide direct legal services as well as access to legal resources and advocacy; and c) spearhead and/or support workplace-related law reform efforts to improve working conditions.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Doyle & Seelbach PLLC

7700 West Highway 71, Ste. 250, Austin, Texas, 78735, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Doyle & Seelbach PLLC is a Texas law firm that focuses on civil litigation, including personal injury and business disputes. We provide big firm caliber representation at a small firm value. Our founders were partners at one of the largest law firms in Texas. We've handled multi-million dollar disputes and developed sophisticated strategies for winning personal injury cases and business disputes. We give our clients the attention they deserve and resolve all cases as quickly and efficiently as possible. BUSINESS DISPUTES We have extensive experience representing clients in various types of business disputes, including: real estate, construction, contract, technology, labor & employment, property damage, partnership disputes, banking and financial services. We are not afraid of the courtroom and plan for trial from day one. PERSONAL INJURY We have successfully resolved hundreds of personal injury cases, including workplace injury claims filed against Texas nonsubscribers, products liability, car wrecks, trucking accidents, medical malpractice, premises liability claims and other general liability matters. We regularly litigate cases involving serious bodily injuries and fatalities.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/justice-at-work.jpeg
Justice at Work
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doyle-seelbach-pllc.jpeg
Doyle & Seelbach PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Justice at Work
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Doyle & Seelbach PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Justice at Work in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Doyle & Seelbach PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — Justice at Work (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Justice at Work cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Doyle & Seelbach PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Doyle & Seelbach PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/justice-at-work.jpeg
Justice at Work
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doyle-seelbach-pllc.jpeg
Doyle & Seelbach PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Justice at Work company and Doyle & Seelbach PLLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Doyle & Seelbach PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Justice at Work company.

In the current year, Doyle & Seelbach PLLC company and Justice at Work company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Doyle & Seelbach PLLC company nor Justice at Work company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Doyle & Seelbach PLLC company nor Justice at Work company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Doyle & Seelbach PLLC company nor Justice at Work company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Justice at Work company nor Doyle & Seelbach PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Justice at Work nor Doyle & Seelbach PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Justice at Work company nor Doyle & Seelbach PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Doyle & Seelbach PLLC company employs more people globally than Justice at Work company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Justice at Work nor Doyle & Seelbach PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Justice at Work nor Doyle & Seelbach PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Justice at Work nor Doyle & Seelbach PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Justice at Work nor Doyle & Seelbach PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Justice at Work nor Doyle & Seelbach PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Justice at Work nor Doyle & Seelbach PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X