Comparison Overview

Just Packaging, Inc

VS

Valley Distribution and Logistics

Just Packaging, Inc

450 Oak Tree Ave, South Plainfield, 07080, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://justpackaging.com

Just Packaging Inc. started in 1985 with 3 employees, one conveyor belt, and an elevator for a loading dock all in a small basement barely 2500 square feet. Today, with over 22 conveyer belts, 120 full time, 450 part time, 28 loading docks between two state of the art 170,000 & 40,000 sq ft facilities, we are at the forefront of the industry. While our name is familiar within the industry, we are simply not “just” packaging anymore. Over the years we have developed and built a leading facility that assembles, warehouses, distributes, picks and packs, bottles, decorates, and handles back office support for our clients. What separates JPI from the rest is not only its expertise, but what started as two business associates has morphed into a multi-generational family affair.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 60
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Valley Distribution and Logistics

1887 Latham St, Memphis, Tennessee, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-16
Between 750 and 799
http://www.valleydl.com

Valley Distribution and Logistics is located in Memphis, TN, the best outbound single point distribution location in the United States. We provide warehousing, order fulfillment, and freight services for our customers, with an initial focus on small to middle market consumer packaged goods companies. Our general manager has over 30 years of experience in third party warehousing executive management at companies including Williams Sonoma, Navistar, Tire and Battery Corporation, and Thomas and Betts.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/just-packaging.jpeg
Just Packaging, Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valley-distribution-and-logistics.jpeg
Valley Distribution and Logistics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Just Packaging, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Valley Distribution and Logistics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Just Packaging, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Valley Distribution and Logistics in 2025.

Incident History — Just Packaging, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Just Packaging, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Valley Distribution and Logistics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Valley Distribution and Logistics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/just-packaging.jpeg
Just Packaging, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valley-distribution-and-logistics.jpeg
Valley Distribution and Logistics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Just Packaging, Inc company and Valley Distribution and Logistics company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Valley Distribution and Logistics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Just Packaging, Inc company.

In the current year, Valley Distribution and Logistics company and Just Packaging, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Valley Distribution and Logistics company nor Just Packaging, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Valley Distribution and Logistics company nor Just Packaging, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Valley Distribution and Logistics company nor Just Packaging, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Just Packaging, Inc company nor Valley Distribution and Logistics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Just Packaging, Inc nor Valley Distribution and Logistics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Just Packaging, Inc company nor Valley Distribution and Logistics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Just Packaging, Inc company employs more people globally than Valley Distribution and Logistics company, reflecting its scale as a Warehousing.

Neither Just Packaging, Inc nor Valley Distribution and Logistics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Just Packaging, Inc nor Valley Distribution and Logistics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Just Packaging, Inc nor Valley Distribution and Logistics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Just Packaging, Inc nor Valley Distribution and Logistics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Just Packaging, Inc nor Valley Distribution and Logistics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Just Packaging, Inc nor Valley Distribution and Logistics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References