Comparison Overview

Juniper Systems Limited

VS

HardSoft Computers

Juniper Systems Limited

The Old Forge, Hewell Lane, None, Tardebigge, Worcestershire, GB, B97 6QL
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Based in Birmingham, UK, Juniper Systems Limited is the EMEA branch of Juniper Systems, Inc., a world leader in the design and manufacture of ultra-rugged handheld computers. Serving Europe, U.K., Middle East, Africa, and India, we deliver field data collection solutions for use in extreme environments. Since 1993, professionals have relied on Juniper Systems’ innovative mobile technology in the geomatics, industrial, natural resources, utilities and public services, and military markets.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HardSoft Computers

2a The Barn, Sawbridgeworth, Sawbridgeworth, Hertfordshire, CM21 9AE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Founded in 1984, by brothers Andrew and Phil, HardSoft has taken a completely unique approach to leasing. With our strong partnerships with our suppliers, an Apple authorised reseller and an accredited Credit Broker we are proud to say that we can offer bespoke One Stop solutions for your tech and finance needs. We provide flexible, affordable, and scalable options for your business needs – whether you’re a startup, SMB or larger Enterprise business we can help you. Each device also includes our Service wrapper – meaning we configure, support and cover 3 years warranty so you don’t have to! Follow for our updates, blog posts, industry facts and more. Subscribe to our YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/HardSoftComputers?sub_confirmation=1 Check out our Facebook here: https://www.facebook.com/HardSoftComputers Check out our Twitter here: https://twitter.com/HardSoft_

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/juniper-systems-ltd-.jpeg
Juniper Systems Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hardsoft-computers.jpeg
HardSoft Computers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Juniper Systems Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HardSoft Computers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Juniper Systems Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HardSoft Computers in 2025.

Incident History — Juniper Systems Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Juniper Systems Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HardSoft Computers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HardSoft Computers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/juniper-systems-ltd-.jpeg
Juniper Systems Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hardsoft-computers.jpeg
HardSoft Computers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Juniper Systems Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to HardSoft Computers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, HardSoft Computers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Juniper Systems Limited company.

In the current year, HardSoft Computers company and Juniper Systems Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HardSoft Computers company nor Juniper Systems Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither HardSoft Computers company nor Juniper Systems Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HardSoft Computers company nor Juniper Systems Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Juniper Systems Limited company nor HardSoft Computers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Juniper Systems Limited nor HardSoft Computers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Juniper Systems Limited company nor HardSoft Computers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Juniper Systems Limited nor HardSoft Computers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Juniper Systems Limited nor HardSoft Computers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Juniper Systems Limited nor HardSoft Computers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Juniper Systems Limited nor HardSoft Computers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Juniper Systems Limited nor HardSoft Computers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Juniper Systems Limited nor HardSoft Computers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H