Comparison Overview

Jumpman Gaming

VS

Casino Marbella

Jumpman Gaming

2nd Floor, 3A Albert House, St Peter Port, GY11AJ, GG
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Jumpman Gaming is one of the fastest growing brands in the eGaming industry. We work with partners across the globe to deliver bespoke and engaging online games since our journey started in 2009. We have built and maintained more than 100 brands on behalf of multinational partners, of which, many have won industry awards. Our data-savvy team are based in St Peter Port, Guernsey at a bespoke office space (we think one of the coolest offices in the island). It was designed to foster dynamic thinking, teamwork and a positive attitude as we aim to become the biggest and best online gaming network in the UK. We are always keen to hear from individuals who share our vision and are interested in working at a leading innovator in online gaming. Our team are encouraged to take personal responsibility and develop creative solutions whilst enjoying a fun environment and first-class benefits. You can contact the team via our website below if you’re interested in becoming part of our leading team or becoming a trusted partner.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Casino Marbella

Carretera Nacional 340, K174, Puerto Banús, Marbella, 29660, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Casino Marbella is a luxury boutique Casino located in the most exclusive corner of Costa del Sol. We offer an exceptional selection of entertainment options - sophisticated mediterranean dishes carefully curated by Chef Agustín Román, classic cocktails, american roulette, blackjack, poker games and state of the art slot machines. Casino Marbella is not just a gaming experience, it is unforgettable emotions.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jumpman-gaming.jpeg
Jumpman Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casino-marbella.jpeg
Casino Marbella
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jumpman Gaming
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Casino Marbella
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jumpman Gaming in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Casino Marbella in 2025.

Incident History — Jumpman Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jumpman Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Casino Marbella (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Casino Marbella cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jumpman-gaming.jpeg
Jumpman Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casino-marbella.jpeg
Casino Marbella
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Casino Marbella company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jumpman Gaming company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Casino Marbella company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jumpman Gaming company.

In the current year, Casino Marbella company and Jumpman Gaming company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Casino Marbella company nor Jumpman Gaming company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Casino Marbella company nor Jumpman Gaming company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Casino Marbella company nor Jumpman Gaming company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jumpman Gaming company nor Casino Marbella company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jumpman Gaming nor Casino Marbella holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Jumpman Gaming company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Casino Marbella company.

Casino Marbella company employs more people globally than Jumpman Gaming company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Jumpman Gaming nor Casino Marbella holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jumpman Gaming nor Casino Marbella holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jumpman Gaming nor Casino Marbella holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jumpman Gaming nor Casino Marbella holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jumpman Gaming nor Casino Marbella holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jumpman Gaming nor Casino Marbella holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H