Comparison Overview

Judith A. Kaluzny

VS

Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C.

Judith A. Kaluzny

149 West Whiting Avenue, Fullerton, CA, 92832, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Mediation is privately guided decision making, away from courtroom pressures.To achieve a fair settlement of all issues for a divorce or separation, a mediator-lawyer helps both sides to resolve all problems in a comfortable setting, and in an informed and consensual manner. We offer a consultation at no cost to explain the mediation process, the cost, and to help you decide if mediation is the most effective way for you to terminate your relationship. We also assist unmarried parents and domestic partnerships. Decisions are your own for parenting of the children, allocation of assets and liabilities, spousal and child support. Decisions will be based on full disclosure of all property, assets, debts and earnings. Valuations are made of all assets such as pensions, businesses, or real estate. A complete and written understanding by both parties of all necessary facts is the result and the basis for a judgment to be filed with the court.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C.

9100 Wilshire Blvd, Beverly Hills, 90212, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Segal, Cohen & Landis, PC, a law firm of tax attorneys, collectively has over forty years of tax litigation experience and have successfully resolved over 8,500 IRS disputes. IRS tax attorneys in our firm possess Master of Law degrees (LL.M) in Taxation with specialties in IRS dispute and controversy resolution. Our IRS Tax Attorneys resolve IRS Wage Garnishments, Levies, IRS Liens or Back Taxes. We negotiate Offer in Compromise or Installment Agreements with the IRS. Segal, Cohen & Landis has a stellar reputation in the legal community, and an exemplary record of customer satisfaction.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/judith-a.-kaluzny.jpeg
Judith A. Kaluzny
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scltaxlaw.jpeg
Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Judith A. Kaluzny
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Judith A. Kaluzny in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — Judith A. Kaluzny (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Judith A. Kaluzny cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/judith-a.-kaluzny.jpeg
Judith A. Kaluzny
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scltaxlaw.jpeg
Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Judith A. Kaluzny company and Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Judith A. Kaluzny company.

In the current year, Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company and Judith A. Kaluzny company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company nor Judith A. Kaluzny company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company nor Judith A. Kaluzny company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company nor Judith A. Kaluzny company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Judith A. Kaluzny company nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Judith A. Kaluzny nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Judith A. Kaluzny company nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. company employs more people globally than Judith A. Kaluzny company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Judith A. Kaluzny nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Judith A. Kaluzny nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Judith A. Kaluzny nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Judith A. Kaluzny nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Judith A. Kaluzny nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Judith A. Kaluzny nor Segal, Cohen & Landis, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X