Comparison Overview

Judicial Watch

VS

Gemeente Bedum

Judicial Watch

425 Third St SW, Washington, DC, 20024, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. Through our educational endeavors, we advocate high standards of ethics and morality in our nation's public life and seek to ensure that political and judicial officials do not abuse the powers entrusted to them by the American people. Our motto is "Because no one is above the law"​. To this end, we use open records and freedom of information laws and other tools to investigate and uncover misconduct by government officials and litigation to hold to account politicians and public officials who engage in corrupt activities. Litigation and the civil discovery process not only uncover information for the education of the American people on anti-corruption issues, but can also provide a basis for civil authorities to criminally prosecute corrupt officials. We seek to ensure high ethical standards in the judiciary through monitoring activities and the use of the judicial ethics process to hold judges to account. Through its Open Records Project, Judicial Watch also provides training and legal services to other conservatives concerning how to effectively use the Freedom of Information Act and other open records laws to achieve conservative goals of accountability and openness in government.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gemeente Bedum

9781 JL, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849

Postbus 38 9780 AA Bedum Bezoekadres: Schoolstraat 1 Bedum De gemeente Bedum ligt ten noorden van de gemeente Groningen aan de spoorlijn Groningen-Delfzijl. Aan de westkant grenst Bedum aan de gemeente Winsum. Ten noorden van Bedum ligt de gemeente Eemsmond. De gemeenten Loppersum en Ten Boer zijn de twee oostelijke buurgemeenten. De gemeente bestaat uit de dorpen Bedum, Noordwolde, Zuidwolde en Onderdendam. De grootste buurtschappen in de gemeente zijn Ellerhuizen, Onderwierum en Westerdijkshorn. De gemeente Bedum wordt doorsneden door het Boterdiep. Van commercieel belang is deze vaarweg niet meer; de waterrecreatie is de laatste jaren sterk in opkomst.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/judicial-watch.jpeg
Judicial Watch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-bedum.jpeg
Gemeente Bedum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Judicial Watch
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gemeente Bedum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Judicial Watch in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gemeente Bedum in 2025.

Incident History — Judicial Watch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Judicial Watch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gemeente Bedum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gemeente Bedum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/judicial-watch.jpeg
Judicial Watch
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-bedum.jpeg
Gemeente Bedum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gemeente Bedum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Judicial Watch company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gemeente Bedum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Judicial Watch company.

In the current year, Gemeente Bedum company and Judicial Watch company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gemeente Bedum company nor Judicial Watch company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gemeente Bedum company nor Judicial Watch company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gemeente Bedum company nor Judicial Watch company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Judicial Watch company nor Gemeente Bedum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Judicial Watch nor Gemeente Bedum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Judicial Watch company nor Gemeente Bedum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Judicial Watch company employs more people globally than Gemeente Bedum company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Judicial Watch nor Gemeente Bedum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Judicial Watch nor Gemeente Bedum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Judicial Watch nor Gemeente Bedum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Judicial Watch nor Gemeente Bedum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Judicial Watch nor Gemeente Bedum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Judicial Watch nor Gemeente Bedum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N