Comparison Overview

JTR Collections Management

VS

Protozone Inc.

JTR Collections Management

Oakland, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

JTR Collections Management offers a wide range of Collections Management, Registration, and Educational services for private collectors, artist foundations, auction houses, historic houses, and museums of all sizes. Collections Management and Registration services: Collections policy and procedure research and writing Collections and artist research Loan processing and coordination Shipping, packing, and rehousing recommendations Condition reporting Deaccession coordination Collections surveys and inventories Storage recommendations and planning Collections moves Insurance and risk management review and recommendations General Facilities Report research and review Art and artifact safety and security recommendations Installation recommendations Collection review for estate reconciliation Collection records organization, recommendations, and review NAGPRA assistance Historic House upkeep and maintenance recommendations Earthquake mitigation and pest management recommendations AAM Accreditation application research Research and recommendations to expand museum collections access projects and programs to enhance the visitor experience Educational services: Guest Lecturer – Collections Management/Registration techniques Collections handling training Volunteer and docent trainings

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Protozone Inc.

137 Lodge Ave, Huntington Station, 11746, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

At Protozone, we create memorable learning experiences through the use of interactive exhibits. Working closely with clients in a step by step process we develop exhibits that tell your story in a way that families remember and talk about. We are particularly known for our intuitive software programs that allow kids of all ages to explore the information at their own pace and depth.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jtr-collections-management.jpeg
JTR Collections Management
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/protozone-inc-.jpeg
Protozone Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JTR Collections Management
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Protozone Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JTR Collections Management in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Protozone Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — JTR Collections Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JTR Collections Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Protozone Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Protozone Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jtr-collections-management.jpeg
JTR Collections Management
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/protozone-inc-.jpeg
Protozone Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

JTR Collections Management company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Protozone Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Protozone Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JTR Collections Management company.

In the current year, Protozone Inc. company and JTR Collections Management company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Protozone Inc. company nor JTR Collections Management company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Protozone Inc. company nor JTR Collections Management company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Protozone Inc. company nor JTR Collections Management company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JTR Collections Management company nor Protozone Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JTR Collections Management nor Protozone Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither JTR Collections Management company nor Protozone Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Protozone Inc. company employs more people globally than JTR Collections Management company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither JTR Collections Management nor Protozone Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JTR Collections Management nor Protozone Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JTR Collections Management nor Protozone Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JTR Collections Management nor Protozone Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JTR Collections Management nor Protozone Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JTR Collections Management nor Protozone Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H