Comparison Overview

"J Resort"

VS

Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi

"J Resort"

345 N. Arlington Avenue, None, Reno, NV, US, 89501
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Experience Reno’s Newest Resort! "J Resort" is a full-service hotel-casino with over 500 rooms and wide variety of Slots and Table Games. The J has a unique blend of original art, live music, bold flavors, luxurious accommodations, and exciting casino action…And we are just getting started! Take one part live music, one part incredible art, one part gourmet cuisine, add a dash of neon, and blend well. J Resort. Reno’s newest destination, featuring a new casino, new restaurants and two luxury hotel towers – and that’s only the beginning. Be a part of the transformation of Reno’s newest premier resort—A Reno resort unlike any other. "J Resort" it the newest member of the Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. (JEI) family of companies. Jacobs Entertainment Inc. is a developer, owner and operator of gaming and entertainment facilities across the United States. Core to the company’s value is our commitment to ethical leadership, outstanding training, and open employee communication.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Change your latitude and experience the Gulf Coast's most unique gaming destination! At Margaritaville Biloxi, every day is a party with the hottest games and giveaways, plus FINtastic deals on delicious dining! Discover your License to Chill at the One Particular Harbour... Margaritaville Biloxi... It's not just a casino... It's a state of mind!

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jresortreno.jpeg
"J Resort"
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/margaritaville-restaurant-&-casino-biloxi.jpeg
Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
"J Resort"
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for "J Resort" in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi in 2025.

Incident History — "J Resort" (X = Date, Y = Severity)

"J Resort" cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jresortreno.jpeg
"J Resort"
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/margaritaville-restaurant-&-casino-biloxi.jpeg
Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to "J Resort" company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to "J Resort" company.

In the current year, Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company and "J Resort" company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company nor "J Resort" company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company nor "J Resort" company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company nor "J Resort" company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither "J Resort" company nor Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither "J Resort" nor Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither "J Resort" company nor Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi company employs more people globally than "J Resort" company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither "J Resort" nor Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither "J Resort" nor Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither "J Resort" nor Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither "J Resort" nor Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither "J Resort" nor Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi holds HIPAA certification.

Neither "J Resort" nor Margaritaville Restaurant & Casino Biloxi holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H