Comparison Overview

JPIMedia

VS

Literally Media

JPIMedia

1 King Street, London, England, EC2V 8AU, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26

JPI Media is now National World Plc - Please use our new Linkedin page linkedin.com/company/national-world-plc Our news brands - which include The Scotsman and The Yorkshire Post touch the lives of more than 32m people nationally each month, online and in print. Through our continued focus to accelerate our digital offering, we’re able to deliver national and regional advertisers a highly successful platform to link them directly with local audiences.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 164
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Literally Media

190 West Street, Brooklyn, New York, 11222, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Literally Media offers the biggest portfolio of digital comedy and culture brands, offering enduring content loved by 40 million people worldwide. We find authentic voices and grow them with an innovative business approach. Advertisers can reach some of the world’s largest humor and culture audiences, and gain rich analysis through our viral content consultancy. From funny videos to relevant insights, Literally is the place to go for humor and trending content. Our portfolio of legendary digital brands includes Cracked, Know Your Meme, eBaum's World, and Cheezburger.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 141
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jpimedia.jpeg
JPIMedia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/literally-media.jpeg
Literally Media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JPIMedia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Literally Media
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JPIMedia in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Literally Media in 2025.

Incident History — JPIMedia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JPIMedia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Literally Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Literally Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jpimedia.jpeg
JPIMedia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/literally-media.jpeg
Literally Media
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

JPIMedia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Literally Media company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Literally Media company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JPIMedia company.

In the current year, Literally Media company and JPIMedia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Literally Media company nor JPIMedia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Literally Media company nor JPIMedia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Literally Media company nor JPIMedia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JPIMedia company nor Literally Media company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JPIMedia nor Literally Media holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Literally Media company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to JPIMedia company.

JPIMedia company employs more people globally than Literally Media company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither JPIMedia nor Literally Media holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JPIMedia nor Literally Media holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JPIMedia nor Literally Media holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JPIMedia nor Literally Media holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JPIMedia nor Literally Media holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JPIMedia nor Literally Media holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.