Comparison Overview

JP Photography

VS

See Management

JP Photography

None
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

JP Photography was formed in January 2003 by current owner, Judy Percival. People and corporate event photography, based upon prior experience, was immediately available. Weddings and real estate/homes have developed over the years. A degree in business followed by formal photography training have combined to form a foundation for business growth and success.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

See Management

307 7th Avenue, New York, New York, 10001, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

See Management is a premier global talent management and marketing company focused on the worlds of fashion, beauty, entertainment and art. Founded by Anna Casagrande and John Shegda in New York City in 2002, See Management guides the careers of art directors, photographers, set designers, prop stylists, fashion stylists, groomers, hair stylists, makeup artists, and manicurists. Our stable is capable of providing their skills for everything from editorial and advertising work to brand consultation and product development. We are also thrilled to offer a full-service production, casting, location scouting department through See Management Production.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/see-management.jpeg
See Management
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JP Photography
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
See Management
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JP Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for See Management in 2025.

Incident History — JP Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JP Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — See Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

See Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jp-photography.jpeg
JP Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/see-management.jpeg
See Management
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

JP Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to See Management company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, See Management company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JP Photography company.

In the current year, See Management company and JP Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither See Management company nor JP Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither See Management company nor JP Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither See Management company nor JP Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JP Photography company nor See Management company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JP Photography nor See Management holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither JP Photography company nor See Management company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

See Management company employs more people globally than JP Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither JP Photography nor See Management holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JP Photography nor See Management holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JP Photography nor See Management holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JP Photography nor See Management holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JP Photography nor See Management holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JP Photography nor See Management holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N