Comparison Overview

Joshua Tree Publishing

VS

NEJM AI

Joshua Tree Publishing

20 N Wacker Dr, Chicago, Illinois, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Make Your Dream of Being Published a Reality Based in Chicago, Joshua Tree Publishing is an innovative publisher dedicated to making your dreams of being a published author a reality. Not tomorrow. Not next year. But today. We specialize in works that uplift the human spirit, inspire people to reach for higher goals, and touch the hearts of readers. "If you ever wrote a book, you know that getting published is very difficult," John Paul Owles, President of Joshua Tree Publishing remarked. "In today's marketplace, authors, especially first-time ones, are confronted with 'self-publishing' companies that are really vanity presses in disguise. While choosing that route may very well be a means to getting published, a writer's reputation is tarnished by association with companies whose main goal is to charge your credit card rather than read your book." "If you really want to develop a writing career, I encourage you to submit your work to Joshua Tree Publishing where We Believe in Authors."

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NEJM AI

860 Winter St, Waltham, 02451, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

NEJM AI, a new monthly journal from NEJM Group, is the first publication to engage both clinical and technology innovators in applying the rigorous research and publishing standards of the New England Journal of Medicine to evaluate the promises and pitfalls of clinical applications of AI. NEJM AI is leading the way in establishing a stronger evidence base for clinical AI while facilitating dialogue among all parties with a stake in these emerging technologies. We invite you to join your peers on this journey.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joshua-tree-publishing.jpeg
Joshua Tree Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nejm-ai.jpeg
NEJM AI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Joshua Tree Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NEJM AI
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joshua Tree Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEJM AI in 2025.

Incident History — Joshua Tree Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joshua Tree Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NEJM AI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEJM AI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joshua-tree-publishing.jpeg
Joshua Tree Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nejm-ai.jpeg
NEJM AI
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Code Installation
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NEJM AI company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Joshua Tree Publishing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NEJM AI company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Joshua Tree Publishing company has not reported any.

In the current year, NEJM AI company and Joshua Tree Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NEJM AI company nor Joshua Tree Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

NEJM AI company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Joshua Tree Publishing company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NEJM AI company nor Joshua Tree Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Joshua Tree Publishing company nor NEJM AI company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Joshua Tree Publishing nor NEJM AI holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NEJM AI company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Joshua Tree Publishing company.

Neither Joshua Tree Publishing nor NEJM AI holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Joshua Tree Publishing nor NEJM AI holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Joshua Tree Publishing nor NEJM AI holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Joshua Tree Publishing nor NEJM AI holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Joshua Tree Publishing nor NEJM AI holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Joshua Tree Publishing nor NEJM AI holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.