Comparison Overview

Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA

VS

Oben Legal

Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA

155 West Main Street, Columbus, 43215, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Joseph & Joseph & Hanna is listed as a Best Law Firm in U.S. News & World Reports. It is a boutique firm that was born from a large law firm practice. Combining its litigation and business practices, the firm’s representation includes the handling of simple real estate issues to very complex transactions, as well as real estate and business litigation. Joseph & Joseph’s domestic family law section is a formidable presence in Ohio. The firm is experienced in family law and the simplest dissolution to the tackling of the most complicated divorce and custody disputes, both nationally and internationally.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Oben Legal

667 Madison Ave, New York, 10065, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Oben Legal is a next generation ethics and integrity advisory and consulting boutique. We combine a unique blend of legal expertise, operational know-how, and bold creativity, to provide simple, transparent, fixed-cost ethics and compliance solutions for leaders everywhere. Our solutions equip our clients with the confidence to grow and lead responsibly. + Advisory - We provide legal and strategic evaluations to support you as you navigate complex compliance issues to make well-informed risk-based decisions. + Design - We develop plain-language engaging policies and communication & training assets to help you embed integrity into your operations. + Oversight - We help you uncover opportunities for improvement through in-depth monitoring activities and solutions-based assessments. As a Black-owned business, our values enrich the communities we serve and enable our clients build and sustain inclusive cultures by design.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joseph-joseph-co-lpa.jpeg
Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oben Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oben Legal in 2025.

Incident History — Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oben Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oben Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joseph-joseph-co-lpa.jpeg
Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/obenlegal.jpeg
Oben Legal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA company and Oben Legal company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Oben Legal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA company.

In the current year, Oben Legal company and Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Oben Legal company nor Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Oben Legal company nor Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Oben Legal company nor Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA company nor Oben Legal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA nor Oben Legal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA company nor Oben Legal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA nor Oben Legal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA nor Oben Legal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA nor Oben Legal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA nor Oben Legal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA nor Oben Legal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Joseph & Joseph & Hanna Co., LPA nor Oben Legal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X