Comparison Overview

Joseph Berning Printing

VS

Association for PRINT Technologies

Joseph Berning Printing

1850 Dalton Ave., Cincinnati, OH, 45214, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Family-owned since 1883 now in the fifth generation! Mid-sized commercial print shop with the personable feel and customer care of a small company but the printing quality, capabilities, and timeliness of a large company. State-of-the-art technology, innovative materials, and impeccable finishing services result in the finest quality print work available. Capabilities include: ELECTRONIC PRE-PRESS: PC and Mac Capabilities Typesetting Computer-to-Plate Photo Retouching Imposition Digital Color Correction Color Proofing PRINTING: Sheetfed Lithography Varnishes Special Coatings & Laser Inks Aqueous Coatings Posters Brochures Annual Reports Direct Mail Special Promotions Point of Purchase Book Jackets Catalogs Inserts Letterhead, Envelopes, and Business Cards FINISHING SERVICES: Complete Bindery Laminating Trimming Punching Combination Folding Collating Saddle Stitching Wire-O Binding GBC Binding Spiral Binding Embossing Stamping Drilling Die-Cutting Padding Numbering Shrink Wrapping FULFILLMENT: Hand Work Storage Delivery

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Association for PRINT Technologies

450 10th Circle N , None, Nashville, TN, US, 37203
Last Update: 2025-12-18

APTech is a member-driven association that along with its independent subsidiary, WhatTheyThink, is a premier source of print industry news and analysis; media production; specialty events; and educational content on all facets of today’s print industry. APTech is ANSI-accredited to support national and international standards development for the print industry, including ICC, B65, CGATS and USTAG. For complete information about the Association, its programs, and its member companies, visit: https://PrintTechnologies.org or phone: 703/264-7200.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joseph-berning-printing.jpeg
Joseph Berning Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/association-for-print-technologies.jpeg
Association for PRINT Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Joseph Berning Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Association for PRINT Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joseph Berning Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Association for PRINT Technologies in 2025.

Incident History — Joseph Berning Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joseph Berning Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Association for PRINT Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Association for PRINT Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joseph-berning-printing.jpeg
Joseph Berning Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/association-for-print-technologies.jpeg
Association for PRINT Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Joseph Berning Printing company and Association for PRINT Technologies company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Association for PRINT Technologies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Joseph Berning Printing company.

In the current year, Association for PRINT Technologies company and Joseph Berning Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies company nor Joseph Berning Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies company nor Joseph Berning Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies company nor Joseph Berning Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Joseph Berning Printing company nor Association for PRINT Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Joseph Berning Printing nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Joseph Berning Printing company nor Association for PRINT Technologies company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Association for PRINT Technologies company employs more people globally than Joseph Berning Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Joseph Berning Printing nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Joseph Berning Printing nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Joseph Berning Printing nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Joseph Berning Printing nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Joseph Berning Printing nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Joseph Berning Printing nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L