Comparison Overview

Jose Maria Vargas University

VS

University of Calgary

Jose Maria Vargas University

10131 Pines Blvd, Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33026, US
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

JMVU - a higher education multiplex committed to the development of bilingual professionals for the world. Its strength lies in a common vision to provide education that promotes pluralism, solidarity, responsibility, honesty and integrity

NAICS: 611
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 90
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

University of Calgary

Last Update: 2024-08-12 (UTC)

Good

Between 700 and 800

The University of Calgary is a leading Canadian university located in the nation's most enterprising city. The university has a clear strategic direction to become one of Canada's top five research universities, where research and innovative teaching go hand in hand, and where we fully engage the communities we both serve and lead. This strategy is called Eyes High, inspired by the university's Gaelic motto, which translates as 'I will lift up my eyes.โ€™

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 13,503
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jose-maria-vargas-university.jpeg
Jose Maria Vargas University
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucalgary.jpeg
University of Calgary
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Jose Maria Vargas University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Calgary
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jose Maria Vargas University in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Calgary in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Jose Maria Vargas University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jose Maria Vargas University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” University of Calgary (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Calgary cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jose-maria-vargas-university.jpeg
Jose Maria Vargas University
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucalgary.jpeg
University of Calgary
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2016
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Jose Maria Vargas University company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to University of Calgary company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Calgary company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Jose Maria Vargas University company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Calgary company and Jose Maria Vargas University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

University of Calgary company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Jose Maria Vargas University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of Calgary company nor Jose Maria Vargas University company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Calgary company nor Jose Maria Vargas University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jose Maria Vargas University company nor University of Calgary company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

University of Calgary company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jose Maria Vargas University company.

University of Calgary company employs more people globally than Jose Maria Vargas University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. In versions prior to 1.3.26, unauthenticated attackers can create or modify API keys for any user by passing that user's id in the request body to the `api/auth/api-key/create` route. `session?.user ?? (authRequired ? null : { id: ctx.body.userId })`. When no session exists but `userId` is present in the request body, `authRequired` becomes false and the user object is set to the attacker-controlled ID. Server-only field validation only executes when `authRequired` is true (lines 280-295), allowing attackers to set privileged fields. No additional authentication occurs before the database operation, so the malicious payload is accepted. The same pattern exists in the update endpoint. This is a critical authentication bypass enabling full an unauthenticated attacker can generate an API key for any user and immediately gain complete authenticated access. This allows the attacker to perform any action as the victim user using the api key, potentially compromise the user data and the application depending on the victim's privileges. Version 1.3.26 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Allstar is a GitHub App to set and enforce security policies. In versions prior to 4.5, a vulnerability in Allstarโ€™s Reviewbot component caused inbound webhook requests to be validated against a hard-coded, shared secret. The value used for the secret token was compiled into the Allstar binary and could not be configured at runtime. In practice, this meant that every deployment using Reviewbot would validate requests with the same secret unless the operator modified source code and rebuilt the component - an expectation that is not documented and is easy to miss. All Allstar releases prior to v4.5 that include the Reviewbot code path are affected. Deployments on v4.5 and later are not affected. Those who have not enabled or exposed the Reviewbot endpoint are not exposed to this issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities with Calendar events in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.35 through 7.4.3.111, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.7, 7.4 update 35 through update 92, and 7.3 update 25 through update 36 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a userโ€™s (1) First Name, (2) Middle Name or (3) Last Name text field.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Python Social Auth is a social authentication/registration mechanism. In versions prior to 5.6.0, upon authentication, the user could be associated by e-mail even if the `associate_by_email` pipeline was not included. This could lead to account compromise when a third-party authentication service does not validate provided e-mail addresses or doesn't require unique e-mail addresses. Version 5.6.0 contains a patch. As a workaround, review the authentication service policy on e-mail addresses; many will not allow exploiting this vulnerability.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Confidential Containers's Trustee project contains tools and components for attesting confidential guests and providing secrets to them. In versions prior to 0.15.0, the attestation-policy endpoint didn't check if the kbs-client submitting the request was actually authenticated (had the right key). This allowed any kbs-client to actually change the attestation policy. Version 0.15.0 fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X