Comparison Overview

Jordan IP Law, LLC

VS

Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC

Jordan IP Law, LLC

1701 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20006, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At Jordan IP Law, LLC, we help to extend the growth of your business by providing large firm patent experience with unprecedented personal attention at a value that meets your bottom line. In particular, we provide the full spectrum of IP-related legal services, with a particular emphasis on high quality, low overhead patent counseling and prosecution in the electrical, computer, software and mechanical arts.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC

805 FIFTEENTH ST NW, None, Washington, Washington DC, US, 20005
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC is one of the nation’s preeminent law firms devoted to empowering workers and the institutions that advocate for them. Founded seven decades ago by a trio of renowned labor lawyers, we are now thirty lawyers representing a group of clients that extends beyond unions to include pension and health funds as well as progressive non-profit organizations. Although small enough to work together on a single floor in our building, we handle big cases, including complex trial and appellate litigation throughout the country. With a history of being asked to take on the toughest challenges facing unions, we have been characterized as “the voice of labor.” But we also frequently litigate in areas outside of labor law, including federal and state constitutional law, antitrust, defamation, RICO, and more. In addition to our national litigation practice, we have a thriving employee-benefits practice, which is part of our broader counseling practice.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jordan-ip-law-pc.jpeg
Jordan IP Law, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bredhoff-&-kaiser-pllc.jpeg
Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jordan IP Law, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jordan IP Law, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — Jordan IP Law, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jordan IP Law, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jordan-ip-law-pc.jpeg
Jordan IP Law, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bredhoff-&-kaiser-pllc.jpeg
Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jordan IP Law, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jordan IP Law, LLC company.

In the current year, Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC company and Jordan IP Law, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC company nor Jordan IP Law, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC company nor Jordan IP Law, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC company nor Jordan IP Law, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jordan IP Law, LLC company nor Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jordan IP Law, LLC nor Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jordan IP Law, LLC company nor Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC company employs more people globally than Jordan IP Law, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Jordan IP Law, LLC nor Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jordan IP Law, LLC nor Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jordan IP Law, LLC nor Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jordan IP Law, LLC nor Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jordan IP Law, LLC nor Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jordan IP Law, LLC nor Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X