Comparison Overview

Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc.

VS

Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand

Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc.

215 Casa Park Drive, Mt. Zion, IL, 62549, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Established in 1995, Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. provides Controls Engineering, Consulting and turn-key factory automation/integration services. Our automation solutions succeed by applying superior technical knowledge, in depth process expertise and strong project management skills. Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. is dedicated to providing its customers with high quality control systems. We complement the customer's specifications by maintaining strict internal specifications. We continuously strive to improve our efficiency and effectiveness in providing the highest quality services available. Our primary objective is customer satisfaction.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand

Level 3, 66 Waterloo Road, Macquarie Park, 2113, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1915, Yokogawa is a leading provider of Industrial Automation, Process Safety, Process Instrumentation, Cloud, Data Analytics and Energy Management solutions. Combining ultra-reliable technology with engineering excellence, Yokogawa delivers field proven operational improvement, safety, quality, and reliability. With a presence in the region for over thirty years, we have been improving the lives of everyday Australians and New Zealanders through the provision of engineering and solutions excellence to key industries and critical infrastructure. Our reputation for quality and reliability ensures the highest standards of water purity, food quality, reliable and sustainable energy provision plus minerals supply to help grow our economies. Our dedication to building a safe and sustainable future through emissions monitoring, raw materials reduction and process improvements have been rewarded with globally recognised awards. As an energetic, service-focused business with an enviable reputation for quality and reliability, our people are our strength. Acknowledged at the highest levels for meeting the most demanding of schedules, often on applications that test the limits of conventional platforms and expertise, we work collaboratively with our clients to ensure an optimal outcome designed and installed to the highest possible safety standards. Our resilient transformation approach to improving your operations not only utilises our fit for purpose technology but delves into the best-in-class expertise which is the foundation for some of the world’s most successful Power generators. A proudly diverse and inclusive organisation, we provide solutions that enhance safety, ensure accurate and reliable operation, open windows to previously inaccessible process insights and increase overall plant efficiency. Our total solutions approach ranges from specific process measurement, through packaged applications to complete remote operations solutions.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 244
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jordan-industrial-controls-inc-.jpeg
Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yokogawa-australia-newzealand.jpeg
Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand in 2025.

Incident History — Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jordan-industrial-controls-inc-.jpeg
Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yokogawa-australia-newzealand.jpeg
Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. company.

In the current year, Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand company and Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand company nor Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand company nor Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand company nor Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. company nor Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. nor Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. company nor Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand company employs more people globally than Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. nor Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. nor Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. nor Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. nor Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. nor Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jordan Industrial Controls, Inc. nor Yokogawa Australia & New Zealand holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H