Comparison Overview

Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C.

VS

Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys

Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Jones Patterson & Tucker is a full service law firm providing legal services in nearly every area of law. Our attorneys have been providing professional pro-active legal services in southern Indiana for over 35 years. Our office is located in downtown Columbus, Indiana on the corner of 4th and Franklin Streets.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys

44 School St, Boston, Massachusetts, 02108, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Our mission at Nussbaum Law Group P.C. is to provide top-notch legal service and advice on a personal and professional level and to work diligently to get you and your family the settlement you deserve. Here at Nussbaum Law Group, P.C. we are focused solely on personal injuries which can change your life within a moment. We believe in listening to our clients and ensuring them that their legal matter is of utmost importance to us and not just another case for our firm. We believe in treating our clients like we do our family because we understand that our clients are going through trying and difficult times and they need a caring, compassionate and understanding environment. We will work zealously for each client and respect his or her concerns. We are personally invested in each client and that is why we offer a no-obligation free consultation. Our kind and genuine team will make you feel right at home.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/larrymylawyer.jpeg
Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys in 2025.

Incident History — Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/larrymylawyer.jpeg
Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company.

In the current year, Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys company and Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys company nor Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys company nor Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys company nor Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company nor Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company nor Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company and Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X