Comparison Overview

Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C.

VS

Utah Legal Services

Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Jones Patterson & Tucker is a full service law firm providing legal services in nearly every area of law. Our attorneys have been providing professional pro-active legal services in southern Indiana for over 35 years. Our office is located in downtown Columbus, Indiana on the corner of 4th and Franklin Streets.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Utah Legal Services

960 S Main St, SALT LAKE CITY, 84101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We provide free legal services to low-income Utahns who qualify. We receive funding to help domestic violence survivors, tenants in housing cases, and those who need public benefits. We can also help Native Americans, senior citizens, migrant farm workers, and some individuals who qualify for expungement of their criminal record. If you would like to find out whether you are eligible for free legal representation or advice, please visit www.utahlegalservices.org and click "Apply for Help Online Now!" Ofrecemos servicios legales gratuitos a los habitantes de Utah con bajos ingresos que califican. Recibimos fondos para ayudar a sobrevivientes de violencia doméstica, inquilinos en casos de vivienda y aquellos que necesitan de beneficios públicos. También podemos ayudar a los americanos nativos, ancianos, trabajadores migrantes y algunos individuos que califiquen con los requisitos para la cancelación de sus antecedentes penales. Si desea saber si usted es elegible para representación legal gratis o asesoramiento legal, por favor visita www.utahlegalservices.org.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 80
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Utah Legal Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Utah Legal Services in 2025.

Incident History — Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Utah Legal Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Utah Legal Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/utah-legal-services-inc..jpeg
Utah Legal Services
Incidents

FAQ

Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Utah Legal Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Utah Legal Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company.

In the current year, Utah Legal Services company and Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Utah Legal Services company nor Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Utah Legal Services company nor Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Utah Legal Services company nor Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company nor Utah Legal Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Utah Legal Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company nor Utah Legal Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Utah Legal Services company employs more people globally than Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Utah Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Utah Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Utah Legal Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Utah Legal Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Utah Legal Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jones Patterson & Tucker, P.C. nor Utah Legal Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X