Comparison Overview

Jonathan Hurley Design

VS

Silverpoint Graphic Design

Jonathan Hurley Design

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03

We are in the business of making your business look good We can make you look good on paper (or card) We can make you look good on the road. We can make you look good at exhibition or conference. We can make you look good online. Because when you look good it makes us look good.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Silverpoint Graphic Design

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Information can be successfully delivered when it is subtle and falls softly into consciousness, or it can be bold and take risks and awaken you to an idea that’s entirely new -- Silverpoint delivers your message in the way that’s most appropriate for you. Some of what we offer include: Logos, Identity, Brochures. Catalogs, Promotions, Corporate, Small Business, Individual

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jonathan-hurley-design.jpeg
Jonathan Hurley Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silverpoint-graphic-design.jpeg
Silverpoint Graphic Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jonathan Hurley Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Silverpoint Graphic Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jonathan Hurley Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Silverpoint Graphic Design in 2025.

Incident History — Jonathan Hurley Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jonathan Hurley Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Silverpoint Graphic Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Silverpoint Graphic Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jonathan-hurley-design.jpeg
Jonathan Hurley Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silverpoint-graphic-design.jpeg
Silverpoint Graphic Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Jonathan Hurley Design company and Silverpoint Graphic Design company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Silverpoint Graphic Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jonathan Hurley Design company.

In the current year, Silverpoint Graphic Design company and Jonathan Hurley Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Silverpoint Graphic Design company nor Jonathan Hurley Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Silverpoint Graphic Design company nor Jonathan Hurley Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Silverpoint Graphic Design company nor Jonathan Hurley Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jonathan Hurley Design company nor Silverpoint Graphic Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jonathan Hurley Design nor Silverpoint Graphic Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jonathan Hurley Design company nor Silverpoint Graphic Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Jonathan Hurley Design company and Silverpoint Graphic Design company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Jonathan Hurley Design nor Silverpoint Graphic Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jonathan Hurley Design nor Silverpoint Graphic Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jonathan Hurley Design nor Silverpoint Graphic Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jonathan Hurley Design nor Silverpoint Graphic Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jonathan Hurley Design nor Silverpoint Graphic Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jonathan Hurley Design nor Silverpoint Graphic Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X