Comparison Overview

Jon Bradley Photography

VS

Alexander Nesbitt Photography

Jon Bradley Photography

244 Reading Road, Winnersh, Wokingham, RG41 5AA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 700 and 749

Corporate photographer specialising in: - Event photography - Conference photography - Portrait photography - Press launch photography - Marketing photography Jon is commissioned by the in-house teams & PR agencies representing some of the worlds leading brands. As well as large multinationals, Jon also works with SME's creating marketing and PR images for websites, marketing campaigns, both on and off line. Work here can range from corporate headshots, customised stock images and product photography. We work with leading beauty brands including L'Oreal (Lancome, L'Oreal Paris, L'Oreal Professionnel, Redken), Estee Lauder (Estee Lauder, MAC, Creme de la Mer, Darphin), NARS Cosmetics.. Other clients include Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, Pernod Ricard, Chivas Brothers, Kenneth Green Associates, Alvarez & Marsal.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alexander Nesbitt Photography

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Alexander Nesbitt is an award winning documentary and fine art photographer. He shoots technically challenging, mobile, and remote location photography of inspiring adventures and documentary projects. He has traveled to over 43 countries mostly hitching on trucks and local buses. Widely known for his dramatic Kite boarding, and Snowboarding shots, Alexander Nesbitt shoots in both digital and film.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jon-bradley-photography.jpeg
Jon Bradley Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alexander-nesbitt-photography.jpeg
Alexander Nesbitt Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jon Bradley Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alexander Nesbitt Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jon Bradley Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alexander Nesbitt Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Jon Bradley Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jon Bradley Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alexander Nesbitt Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alexander Nesbitt Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jon-bradley-photography.jpeg
Jon Bradley Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alexander-nesbitt-photography.jpeg
Alexander Nesbitt Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alexander Nesbitt Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jon Bradley Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Alexander Nesbitt Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jon Bradley Photography company.

In the current year, Alexander Nesbitt Photography company and Jon Bradley Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alexander Nesbitt Photography company nor Jon Bradley Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alexander Nesbitt Photography company nor Jon Bradley Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alexander Nesbitt Photography company nor Jon Bradley Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jon Bradley Photography company nor Alexander Nesbitt Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jon Bradley Photography nor Alexander Nesbitt Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jon Bradley Photography company nor Alexander Nesbitt Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Jon Bradley Photography company and Alexander Nesbitt Photography company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Jon Bradley Photography nor Alexander Nesbitt Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jon Bradley Photography nor Alexander Nesbitt Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jon Bradley Photography nor Alexander Nesbitt Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jon Bradley Photography nor Alexander Nesbitt Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jon Bradley Photography nor Alexander Nesbitt Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jon Bradley Photography nor Alexander Nesbitt Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N