Comparison Overview

Joint Venture Silicon Valley

VS

Pando

Joint Venture Silicon Valley

undefined, San Jose, CA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Joint Venture Silicon Valley is a think tank created and supported by the major sectors (business, government, labor and academia). Through the Institute for Regional Studies, the organization provides research assessing the Valley's challenges and opportunities; Joint Venture is also a platform where leaders develop shared priorities and take collaborative action. For more information, visit www.jointventure.org. Interact with Silicon Valley's online data hub at www.SiliconValleyIndicators.org.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pando

undefined, Park City, UT, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Pando exists to bring entrepreneurs who love the mountains together, empowering positive change for our local and global communities. Pando is a 501(c) 3 organization that connects, supports and empowers entrepreneurs, thought leaders, and change makers. We create lasting connections and opportunities for growth for our members, helping them achieve their business dreams. Through programming, education and knowledge-sharing, we seek to connect and support our members.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joint-venture-silicon-valley-network.jpeg
Joint Venture Silicon Valley
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pandolabs.jpeg
Pando
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Joint Venture Silicon Valley
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pando
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joint Venture Silicon Valley in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pando in 2025.

Incident History — Joint Venture Silicon Valley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joint Venture Silicon Valley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pando (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pando cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joint-venture-silicon-valley-network.jpeg
Joint Venture Silicon Valley
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pandolabs.jpeg
Pando
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Joint Venture Silicon Valley company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pando company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pando company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Joint Venture Silicon Valley company.

In the current year, Pando company and Joint Venture Silicon Valley company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pando company nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pando company nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pando company nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley company nor Pando company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor Pando holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pando company.

Joint Venture Silicon Valley company employs more people globally than Pando company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor Pando holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor Pando holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor Pando holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor Pando holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor Pando holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor Pando holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X