Comparison Overview

Joint Venture Silicon Valley

VS

IACSA

Joint Venture Silicon Valley

undefined, San Jose, CA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jointventure.org

Joint Venture Silicon Valley is a think tank created and supported by the major sectors (business, government, labor and academia). Through the Institute for Regional Studies, the organization provides research assessing the Valley's challenges and opportunities; Joint Venture is also a platform where leaders develop shared priorities and take collaborative action. For more information, visit www.jointventure.org. Interact with Silicon Valley's online data hub at www.SiliconValleyIndicators.org.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

IACSA

4058, CH
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 800 and 849
http://www.iacsa.ch

The International Association for Cultural Studies in Architecture (IACSA) is an association according to Art. 60 ff. of the Swiss Civil Code. The mission of the association consists in non-profit activities: 1. in the promotion of scientific, artistic and constructional approaches to the cultural and social appropriation of the built environment, and 2. the creation of an international network of people active in this thematic field.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joint-venture-silicon-valley-network.jpeg
Joint Venture Silicon Valley
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iacsa.jpeg
IACSA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Joint Venture Silicon Valley
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IACSA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joint Venture Silicon Valley in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IACSA in 2025.

Incident History — Joint Venture Silicon Valley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joint Venture Silicon Valley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IACSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IACSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joint-venture-silicon-valley-network.jpeg
Joint Venture Silicon Valley
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iacsa.jpeg
IACSA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IACSA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Joint Venture Silicon Valley company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IACSA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Joint Venture Silicon Valley company.

In the current year, IACSA company and Joint Venture Silicon Valley company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IACSA company nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IACSA company nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IACSA company nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley company nor IACSA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor IACSA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to IACSA company.

Both Joint Venture Silicon Valley company and IACSA company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor IACSA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor IACSA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor IACSA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor IACSA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor IACSA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley nor IACSA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References