Comparison Overview

Johnson Controls

VS

Ingersoll Rand

Johnson Controls

Milwaukee, Cork, Ireland, IE, T12 X8N6
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.johnsoncontrols.com

At Johnson Controls, we transform the environments where people live, work, learn and play. As the global leader in smart, healthy and sustainable buildings, our mission is to reimagine the performance of buildings to serve people, places and the planet. Building on a proud history of 140 years of innovation, we deliver the blueprint of the future for industries such as healthcare, schools, data centers, airports, stadiums, manufacturing and beyond through OpenBlue, our comprehensive digital offering. Today, Johnson Controls offers the world`s largest portfolio of building technology and software as well as service solutions from some of the most trusted names in the industry. Visit www.johnsoncontrols.com for more information.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 65,242
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Ingersoll Rand

525 Harbour Place Drive, Suite 600, Davidson, 28036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.IRCO.com

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE:IR), driven by an entrepreneurial spirit and ownership mindset, is dedicated to Making Life Better for our employees, customers, shareholders, and planet. Customers lean on us for exceptional performance and durability in mission-critical flow creation and industrial solutions. Supported by over 80+ respected brands, our products and services excel in the most complex and harsh conditions. Our employees develop customers for life through their daily commitment to expertise, productivity, and efficiency. For more information, visit www.IRCO.com.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 15,111
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-controls.jpeg
Johnson Controls
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingersoll-rand.jpeg
Ingersoll Rand
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Johnson Controls
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ingersoll Rand
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Johnson Controls has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ingersoll Rand in 2025.

Incident History — Johnson Controls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson Controls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ingersoll Rand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ingersoll Rand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-controls.jpeg
Johnson Controls
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Publicly Accessible Devices, Default Credentials, Unpatched Software Vulnerabilities, Lack of Firewalls/Encryption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingersoll-rand.jpeg
Ingersoll Rand
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Johnson Controls company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ingersoll Rand company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Johnson Controls company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ingersoll Rand company has not reported any.

In the current year, Johnson Controls company has reported more cyber incidents than Ingersoll Rand company.

Johnson Controls company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Ingersoll Rand company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ingersoll Rand company nor Johnson Controls company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ingersoll Rand company nor Johnson Controls company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Johnson Controls company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Ingersoll Rand company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Ingersoll Rand holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ingersoll Rand company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Johnson Controls company.

Johnson Controls company employs more people globally than Ingersoll Rand company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Ingersoll Rand holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Ingersoll Rand holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Ingersoll Rand holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Ingersoll Rand holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Ingersoll Rand holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Ingersoll Rand holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References