Comparison Overview

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

VS

M42 Health

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

1 Johnson and Johnson Plaza, New Brunswick, New Jersey, US, 08901
Last Update: 2025-12-09

At Johnson & Johnson MedTech, we are working to solve the world’s most pressing healthcare challenges through innovations at the intersection of biology and technology. With deep expertise in surgery, orthopaedics, cardiovascular, and vision, we design healthcare solutions that are smarter, less invasive and more personalized. We are developing the next generation of med tech solutions to tackle the most pervasive and complex health challenges for people around the world.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 34,798
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

M42 Health

None
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799

M42 is an Abu Dhabi-based, global tech-enabled healthcare company operating at the forefront of medical advancement. The company is seeking to transform lives through innovative clinical solutions that can solve the world’s most critical health and diagnostic challenges. By harnessing unique medical and data-centric technologies, including genomics and AI, M42 is transforming the traditional healthcare ecosystem and delivering the highest level of precise, patient-centric, and preventative care. M42 has over 20,000 employees and more than 450 facilities in 26 countries around the world. M42 owns a wide portfolio of assets that includes Amana Healthcare, Biogenix Labs, Danat Al Emarat, Diaverum, HealthPoint Hospital, the HealthPlus network of specialty centers, Moorfields Eye Hospital Abu Dhabi, Imperial College London Diabetes Centre, Insights Research Organization & Solutions (IROS), Omics Center of Excellence and National Reference Laboratory, among others.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,110
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-&-johnson-medtech.jpeg
Johnson & Johnson MedTech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m42-health.jpeg
M42 Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Johnson & Johnson MedTech
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
M42 Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson MedTech in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M42 Health in 2025.

Incident History — Johnson & Johnson MedTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson MedTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — M42 Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M42 Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-&-johnson-medtech.jpeg
Johnson & Johnson MedTech
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m42-health.jpeg
M42 Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Johnson & Johnson MedTech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to M42 Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, M42 Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Johnson & Johnson MedTech company.

In the current year, M42 Health company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither M42 Health company nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither M42 Health company nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither M42 Health company nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech company nor M42 Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor M42 Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

M42 Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Johnson & Johnson MedTech company.

Johnson & Johnson MedTech company employs more people globally than M42 Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor M42 Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor M42 Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor M42 Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor M42 Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor M42 Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor M42 Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N