JJ
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
johnson-&-johnson
Website:
Employees number:
108,305
Number of followers:
9,787,784
NAICS:
62
Industry Type:
Homepage:
jnj.com
IP Addresses:
503
Company ID:
JOH_6443293
Scan Status:
Completed
Johnson & Johnson Company CyberSecurity Posture
jnj.com
At Johnson & Johnson, we believe health is everything. As a focused healthcare company, with expertise in Innovative Medicine and MedTech, we’re empowered to tackle the world’s toughest health challenges, innovate through science and technology, and transform patient care. All of this is possible because of our people. We’re passionate innovators who put people first, and through our purpose-driven culture and talented workforce, we are stronger than ever. Learn more at https://www.jnj.com. Community Guidelines: http://www.jnj.com/social-media-community-guidelines
Johnson & Johnson A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
JJ Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
JJ
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
JJ Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
JJ
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
JJ Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
4
Attack Types
1
Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported that Johnson & Johnson, Inc. experienced an external system breach (hacking) on August 16, 2024, affecting 3,225 individuals in total, including 3 residents of Maine. The breach was discovered on August 17, 2024, and individuals affected were offered 12 months of identity theft protection through Equifax Identity Defense.
Johnson & Johnson
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: Johnson & Johnson, along with other companies like CVS Health and Walgreens, has been involved in opioid settlements due to their role in the addiction crisis. The article highlights concerns about the misuse of settlement funds, which were intended to address the opioid crisis but are being diverted to other purposes. This misuse includes spending on unrelated projects like road repairs and jail body scanners, rather than helping those affected by addiction. The misallocation of these funds has led to widespread concern and advocacy for better oversight.
Johnson & Johnson
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The home addresses of hundreds of Irish people had been published online in a data breach by a pharmaceutical company. The error left people vulnerable to hackers as the company also shared email addresses that may be linked to other online accounts.
Johnson & Johnson (J&J)
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Johnson & Johnson is facing a **17% surge in lawsuits** (now **73,570+ cases**) alleging its talc-based baby powder causes cancer, following a failed attempt to force a **$9 billion global settlement** through bankruptcy court. A recent California jury awarded **$966 million** to a deceased woman’s family, linking her cancer to long-term baby powder use. Analysts predict total payouts could exceed **$11 billion**, with J&J already spending **$3 billion** on prior settlements. The company withdrew the product in 2023 but continues to deny liability, claiming talc is safe. Repeated legal defeats—including a bankruptcy judge rejecting its Chapter 11 strategy—have forced J&J back into state and federal courts, where upcoming trials (starting next month) risk further billion-dollar verdicts. The litigation threatens **reputational damage, financial strain (projected $11B+), and operational disruption**, as J&J defends cases across multiple jurisdictions while its Kenvue spinoff shares liability. State juries have repeatedly ruled against J&J, though some awards were later reduced on appeal. The escalating caseload (potentially **93,000+ claims**) compounds legal costs and public scrutiny, undermining trust in the brand.
JJ Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for JJ
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)
Johnson & Johnson has 33.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Johnson & Johnson has 56.25% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types JJ vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
Johnson & Johnson reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — JJ (X = Date, Y = Severity)
JJ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
JJ Company Subsidiaries
At Johnson & Johnson, we believe health is everything. As a focused healthcare company, with expertise in Innovative Medicine and MedTech, we’re empowered to tackle the world’s toughest health challenges, innovate through science and technology, and transform patient care. All of this is possible because of our people. We’re passionate innovators who put people first, and through our purpose-driven culture and talented workforce, we are stronger than ever. Learn more at https://www.jnj.com. Community Guidelines: http://www.jnj.com/social-media-community-guidelines
Loading...
JJ Similar Companies
SARquavitae
SARquavitae, personas que cuidan a las personas SARquavitae es la mayor plataforma de España de servicios sanitarios y sociales de atención a las personas. La plantilla, formada por 12.200 profesionales, ofrece más de 10.900 plazas repartidas por todo el territorio español y atiende a unas 200.0
The Netcare Group (JSE: NTC) offers a unique, comprehensive range of medical services across the healthcare spectrum, enabling us to serve the health and care needs of each individual who entrust their care to us. Our focus on implementing sophisticated digital systems will enable us to provide care
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston Children's Hospital is a 404-bed comprehensive center for pediatric health care. As one of the largest pediatric medical centers in the United States, Boston Children's offers a complete range of health care services for children from birth through 21 years of age. (Our services can begin int
Yeditepe University Hospital
Университет Едитепе был основан фондом ISTEK в 1996 году. 1. Стоматологическая клиника Университета Йедитепе, 1996 г. 2. Больница Козьятаги Университета Едитепе в 2005 г. 3. Поликлиника Багдат Каддеси Университета Едитепе, 2006 г. 4. Глазной центр Университета Йедитепе, 2007 г. 5. Центр генетическо
R1 RCM
R1 is the leader in healthcare revenue management, helping providers achieve new levels of performance through smart orchestration. A pioneer in the industry, R1 created the first Healthcare Revenue Operating System: a modular, intelligent platform that integrates automation, AI, and human expertise
Select Medical made a commitment more than 20 years ago to deliver an exceptional patient care experience that promotes healing and recovery in a compassionate environment. We have honored that promise by helping define the nation's standard of excellence in specialized hospital and rehabilitative c
EsSalud
El Seguro Social de Salud, EsSalud, es un organismo público descentralizado, con personería jurídica de derecho público interno, adscrito al Sector Trabajo y Promoción Social. Tiene por finalidad dar cobertura a los asegurados y sus derechohabientes, a través del otorgamiento de prestaciones de pre
Inova Health
Inova is Northern Virginia’s leading nonprofit healthcare provider, offering world-class clinical excellence to everyone in our communities with a warm, human touch. Our 22,000+ team members collaborate to achieve individual and group health goals in partnership with every one of the 2M+ individuals
Keralty
Anteriormente Organización Sanitas Internacional, Keralty es un grupo empresarial de valor en salud, con más de 40 años de experiencia conformado por empresas de aseguramiento y prestación de servicios de salud y una red propia hospitalaria y asistencial. También forman parte de Keralty institucion
.png)
JJ CyberSecurity News
November 19, 2025 05:13 PM
Eagles Announce OT Roster Move With Lane Johnson Hurt
The Philadelphia Eagles' offensive line depth is going to be heavily tested in the coming weeks. Lane Johnson is dealing with a Lisfranc...
November 19, 2025 05:07 PM
Johnson Fistel Investigates Semrush (SEMR) Shareholders’ Rights Following Adobe’s $12 Buyout Offer
SAN DIEGO, Nov. 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Shareholder rights law firm Johnson Fistel, PLLP has launched an investigation into whether the...
November 19, 2025 05:02 PM
Johnson County Council seeking applicants for county boards
Local residents are invited to apply for openings on Johnson County boards by Dec. 3. The Johnson County Council has seven board openings...
November 19, 2025 04:54 PM
Johnson Controls’ Metasys update designed for greater device security, easier system management
With the changes, the building automation system is more efficient, can be scaled across multiple sites, speeds configuration and boosts...
November 19, 2025 04:49 PM
Cody Johnson & Wife Brandi Welcome Baby #3!
Cody Johnson and wife Brandi quietly welcomed their third child! Johnson confirmed the news on Country Countdown USA, revealing they had a...
November 19, 2025 04:47 PM
Johnson County Ambulance Service launches free Narcan distribution initiative
The Johnson County Ambulance Service announced it's starting a pilot program to increase community access to Narcan.
November 19, 2025 04:46 PM
Jalen Johnson fills stat sheet Tuesday
Johnson flirted with a triple-double for the second straight game. He has scored at least 24 points in four straight games.
November 19, 2025 04:43 PM
Griffin Johnson Receives 2025 Big Sport Of Turfdom Award
The annual award recognizes a person or group who enhances coverage of Thoroughbred racing through cooperation with media and racing...
November 19, 2025 04:34 PM
January 6 rioter who was pardoned by Trump arrested for child sexual abuse
Andrew Paul Johnson, 44, faces multiple charges in Florida and has pleaded not guilty to the crimes, authorities say.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
JJ CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Johnson & Johnson
The official website of Johnson & Johnson is http://www.jnj.com.
Johnson & Johnson’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Johnson & Johnson’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 791, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Johnson & Johnson’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Johnson & Johnson currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Johnson & Johnson have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Johnson & Johnson is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Johnson & Johnson have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Johnson & Johnson does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Johnson & Johnson comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Johnson & Johnson is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Johnson & Johnson have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Johnson & Johnson does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Johnson & Johnson comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Johnson & Johnson is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Johnson & Johnson have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Johnson & Johnson is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Johnson & Johnson
Johnson & Johnson operates primarily in the Hospitals and Health Care industry.
Number of Employees at Johnson & Johnson
Johnson & Johnson employs approximately 108,305 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Johnson & Johnson
Johnson & Johnson presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Johnson & Johnson’s LinkedIn Followers
Johnson & Johnson’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 9,787,784 followers.
NAICS Classification of Johnson & Johnson
Johnson & Johnson is classified under the NAICS code 62, which corresponds to Health Care and Social Assistance.
Johnson & Johnson’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Johnson & Johnson does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Johnson & Johnson’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Johnson & Johnson maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/johnson-&-johnson.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Johnson & Johnson
As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Johnson & Johnson has experienced 4 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Johnson & Johnson has an estimated 29,962 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Johnson & Johnson ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Johnson & Johnson ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $0.
How does Johnson & Johnson detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with opioid policy institute, third party assistance with popular democracy, and third party assistance with equifax identity defense, and third party assistance with legal defense teams, third party assistance with bankruptcy advisors (failed attempts), third party assistance with public relations firms, and containment measures with product withdrawal (2023), containment measures with replacement with cornstarch-based alternative, containment measures with litigation defense strategy, and remediation measures with proposed $9b global settlement (rejected), remediation measures with preparation for upcoming trials, remediation measures with federal case consolidation (nj district court), and communication strategy with public statements denying talc-asbestos link, communication strategy with emphasis on 100+ years of 'safe use', communication strategy with criticism of lawsuit 'volume over merit'..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Pharmaceutical Company Data Breach
Description: The home addresses of hundreds of Irish people had been published online in a data breach by a pharmaceutical company. The error left people vulnerable to hackers as the company also shared email addresses that may be linked to other online accounts.
Type: Data Breach
Title: Misuse of Opioid Settlement Funds
Description: State attorneys general won billions of dollars in opioid settlements from drug companies accused of fueling the addiction crisis. Concerns have arisen that the settlement funds are not being used for their intended purposes. Advocacy groups are proposing a crowdsourced database to identify potential examples of misuse and prompt attorneys general to investigate.
Type: Financial Misuse
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Johnson & Johnson External System Breach
Description: Johnson & Johnson, Inc. experienced an external system breach (hacking) affecting 3,225 individuals, including 3 residents of Maine.
Date Detected: 2024-08-17
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Title: Johnson & Johnson Faces Surge in Baby Powder Cancer Lawsuits After Failed Bankruptcy Settlement Attempt
Description: Johnson & Johnson (J&J) has experienced a 17% increase in new lawsuits (now totaling ~73,570) alleging its talc-based baby powder causes cancer, following the rejection of its latest bankruptcy-driven global settlement attempt. The company withdrew the product in 2023 but continues to face escalating litigation costs, with predictions of up to 93,000 cases and potential payouts exceeding $11 billion. Juries have repeatedly ruled against J&J, awarding billions in damages (e.g., $966M in a recent California case), though some verdicts were later reduced or overturned on appeal. The company maintains talc is safe and refuses to pay beyond its prior $9B offer, while preparing for new trials in state and federal courts.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z
Type: Product Liability Litigation
Motivation: Financial Gain (Plaintiffs)Corporate AccountabilityConsumer Protection
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach JOH202818522
Data Compromised: Home addresses, Email addresses
Incident : Financial Misuse JOH333071125
Customer Complaints: ['Families affected by the overdose crisis', 'Recovery and harm reduction advocates', 'Policy experts', 'Researchers following the cash']
Incident : Data Breach JOH107072525
Identity Theft Risk: High
Incident : Product Liability Litigation JOH0362103102825
Operational Impact: Increased litigation workloadReputation damageResource diversion to legal defenseProduct withdrawal (2023)
Customer Complaints: 73,570+ lawsuits (as of 2024-09-30)
Brand Reputation Impact: Severe damage due to cancer allegationsLoss of consumer trustNegative media coverageWithdrawal of iconic product
Legal Liabilities: Mass tort litigationJury awards (e.g., $966M in 2024)Potential federal/federal trialsState-level lawsuits (CA, PA, GA, IL, FL)
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $0.00.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Home Addresses, Email Addresses and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach JOH202818522
Entity Type: Pharmaceutical Company
Industry: Pharmaceutical
Location: Ireland
Customers Affected: Hundreds
Incident : Financial Misuse JOH333071125
Entity Name: State Governments
Entity Type: Government
Industry: Public Sector
Location: Multiple States
Incident : Data Breach JOH107072525
Entity Name: Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Healthcare
Customers Affected: 3225
Incident : Product Liability Litigation JOH0362103102825
Entity Name: Johnson & Johnson
Entity Type: Public Multinational Corporation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals, Consumer Goods, Healthcare
Location: New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Size: ~152,700 employees (2023)
Customers Affected: 73,570+ plaintiffs (as of 2024-09-30)
Incident : Product Liability Litigation JOH0362103102825
Entity Name: Kenvue (J&J spinoff)
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Consumer Health
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Financial Misuse JOH333071125
Third Party Assistance: Opioid Policy Institute, Popular Democracy.
Incident : Data Breach JOH107072525
Third Party Assistance: Equifax Identity Defense
Incident : Product Liability Litigation JOH0362103102825
Third Party Assistance: Legal Defense Teams, Bankruptcy Advisors (Failed Attempts), Public Relations Firms.
Containment Measures: Product withdrawal (2023)Replacement with cornstarch-based alternativeLitigation defense strategy
Remediation Measures: Proposed $9B global settlement (rejected)Preparation for upcoming trialsFederal case consolidation (NJ District Court)
Communication Strategy: Public statements denying talc-asbestos linkEmphasis on 100+ years of 'safe use'Criticism of lawsuit 'volume over merit'
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Opioid Policy Institute, Popular Democracy, , Equifax Identity Defense, Legal defense teams, Bankruptcy advisors (failed attempts), Public relations firms, .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach JOH202818522
Type of Data Compromised: Home addresses, Email addresses
Number of Records Exposed: Hundreds
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach JOH107072525
Number of Records Exposed: 3225
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Proposed $9B global settlement (rejected), Preparation for upcoming trials, Federal case consolidation (NJ District Court), .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by product withdrawal (2023), replacement with cornstarch-based alternative, litigation defense strategy and .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Product Liability Litigation JOH0362103102825
Regulations Violated: Potential violations of consumer protection laws, Product liability statutes, Failure to disclose health risks (alleged),
Legal Actions: Class-action lawsuits, State/federal jury trials, Appeals of verdicts, Bankruptcy filings (3 failed attempts),
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Class-action lawsuits, State/federal jury trials, Appeals of verdicts, Bankruptcy filings (3 failed attempts), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Product Liability Litigation JOH0362103102825
Lessons Learned: Bankruptcy strategies may not shield against mass torts, Jury trials pose significant financial risks, Product liability claims can escalate rapidly post-bankruptcy rejection, Reputation damage extends beyond financial costs
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Financial Misuse JOH333071125
Recommendations: Implement a crowdsourced database to identify potential misuse of opioid settlement funds, Encourage attorneys general to take an active oversight roleImplement a crowdsourced database to identify potential misuse of opioid settlement funds, Encourage attorneys general to take an active oversight role
Incident : Product Liability Litigation JOH0362103102825
Recommendations: Reevaluate settlement offers to mitigate long-term costs, Enhance transparency in product safety communications, Explore alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, Monitor state-level jury trends for risk assessmentReevaluate settlement offers to mitigate long-term costs, Enhance transparency in product safety communications, Explore alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, Monitor state-level jury trends for risk assessmentReevaluate settlement offers to mitigate long-term costs, Enhance transparency in product safety communications, Explore alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, Monitor state-level jury trends for risk assessmentReevaluate settlement offers to mitigate long-term costs, Enhance transparency in product safety communications, Explore alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, Monitor state-level jury trends for risk assessment
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Bankruptcy strategies may not shield against mass torts,Jury trials pose significant financial risks,Product liability claims can escalate rapidly post-bankruptcy rejection,Reputation damage extends beyond financial costs.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Financial Misuse JOH333071125
Source: KFF Health News
Incident : Data Breach JOH107072525
Source: Maine Office of the Attorney General
Incident : Product Liability Litigation JOH0362103102825
Source: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Incident : Product Liability Litigation JOH0362103102825
Source: Johnson & Johnson Securities Filings (2024-09)
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: KFF Health News, and Source: Maine Office of the Attorney General, and Source: BloombergUrl: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-01/j-j-s-baby-powder-lawsuits-jump-17-after-bankruptcy-setbackDate Accessed: 2024-10-01, and Source: US District Court for the District of New JerseyUrl: https://www.njd.uscourts.gov/cases/case-information-re-johnson-johnson-talcum-powder-products-marketing-sales-practices-and, and Source: Johnson & Johnson Securities Filings (2024-09).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Product Liability Litigation JOH0362103102825
Investigation Status: Ongoing (active litigation in multiple jurisdictions)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Statements Denying Talc-Asbestos Link, Emphasis On 100+ Years Of 'Safe Use' and Criticism Of Lawsuit 'Volume Over Merit'.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Product Liability Litigation JOH0362103102825
Stakeholder Advisories: Investor Updates Via Securities Filings, Legal Analyses By Bloomberg Intelligence, Academic Commentary (E.G., University Of Richmond).
Customer Advisories: Product withdrawal announcement (2023)No direct advisories on cancer risks
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Investor Updates Via Securities Filings, Legal Analyses By Bloomberg Intelligence, Academic Commentary (E.G., University Of Richmond), Product Withdrawal Announcement (2023), No Direct Advisories On Cancer Risks and .
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Product Liability Litigation JOH0362103102825
Root Causes: Alleged Failure To Warn Consumers Of Talc-Asbestos Risks, Aggressive Bankruptcy Tactics Backfiring, Jury Sympathy For Plaintiffs In Cancer Cases, Historical Product Marketing Practices,
Corrective Actions: Product Reformulation (Cornstarch), Litigation Defense Restructuring, Potential Future Settlement Negotiations,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Opioid Policy Institute, Popular Democracy, , Equifax Identity Defense, Legal Defense Teams, Bankruptcy Advisors (Failed Attempts), Public Relations Firms, .
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Product Reformulation (Cornstarch), Litigation Defense Restructuring, Potential Future Settlement Negotiations, .
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2024-08-17.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {'current_settlements': '$3 billion (historical)', 'projected_total_cost': 'Up to $11 billion', 'recent_jury_award': '$966 million (California case, 2024-10)', 'legal_defense_costs': None}.
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Home addresses, Email addresses and .
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was opioid policy institute, popular democracy, , Equifax Identity Defense, legal defense teams, bankruptcy advisors (failed attempts), public relations firms, .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Product withdrawal (2023)Replacement with cornstarch-based alternativeLitigation defense strategy.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Email addresses and Home addresses.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 327.0.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Class-action lawsuits, State/federal jury trials, Appeals of verdicts, Bankruptcy filings (3 failed attempts), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Reputation damage extends beyond financial costs.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Explore alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, Implement a crowdsourced database to identify potential misuse of opioid settlement funds, Monitor state-level jury trends for risk assessment, Enhance transparency in product safety communications, Reevaluate settlement offers to mitigate long-term costs and Encourage attorneys general to take an active oversight role.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Maine Office of the Attorney General, Johnson & Johnson Securities Filings (2024-09), US District Court for the District of New Jersey, Bloomberg and KFF Health News.
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-01/j-j-s-baby-powder-lawsuits-jump-17-after-bankruptcy-setback, https://www.njd.uscourts.gov/cases/case-information-re-johnson-johnson-talcum-powder-products-marketing-sales-practices-and .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (active litigation in multiple jurisdictions).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Investor updates via securities filings, Legal analyses by Bloomberg Intelligence, Academic commentary (e.g., University of Richmond), .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Product withdrawal announcement (2023)No direct advisories on cancer risks.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=johnson-&-johnson' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
