Comparison Overview

Johnson & Freedman, LLC

VS

Schindlers Attorneys

Johnson & Freedman, LLC

1587 Northeast Expressway, Atlanta, Ggeorgia, 30329, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Johnson and Freedman, L.L.C., a member of the Fannie Mae Retained Attorney Network* as well as a member of the Freddie Mac Designated Council Program^, is a full service law firm primarily serving the financial services industry. We represent this industry in mortgage foreclosure, bankruptcy, litigation, eviction, replevin, commercial litigation, collections and general real estate issues. The firm provides legal services throughout Alabama*, Florida^, Georgia*, Mississippi, North Carolina*, South Carolina*, Tennessee* and Virginia. As the Southeastern leader in the default legal services industry, Johnson and Freedman offers clients skilled counsel combined with innovative approaches to conducting business. We are committed not only to the highest quality of legal service but also to the highest quality client support. Johnson and Freedman maintains a staff of highly qualified attorneys whose training and experience allow us to deliver consistently superior legal services. Beyond maintaining the regulatory requirements of Bar membership, our attorneys attend and participate in numerous conferences and seminars sponsored by our clients and the financial services industry. In addition, we keep our clients informed of current legal developments in the financial services industry through complimentary, on-site seminars and training. * As a member of the Fannie Mae Retained Attorney Network, we are approved in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee. ^ As a member of the Freddie Mac Designated Council Program, we are approved in Florida

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Schindlers Attorneys

3 Melrose Boulevard, Melrose Arch, Gauteng, 2076, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Schindlers Attorneys is a dynamic commercial law firm offering a full range of legal services to both corporate and individual clients in South Africa and around the world. Through our unmatched professionalism and comprehensive knowledge of the South African business environment, we ensure that our lawyers offer the highest calibre legal advice in every situation. Established in 1991, we have grown with our clients to meet their evolving needs. At the same time, we have remained true to our core commitment – to be a leading law firm delivering outstanding, effective results through the provision of responsive, innovative, strategic and commercially astute legal advice. We are an ultramodern legal practice with a spectrum of cross-borders practices that cater for local and multinational corporations, financial institutions, government entities as well as private business individuals concerning their legal needs around the globe. `​ We at Schindlers put the quality of the service that we offer our clients above all else. We know that, that is what is important to our clients and that knowledge and execution is what sets us apart from our competition. We offer a competitive, commendable and timely capability in legal practice. Our innovative approach and creative business solutions are specifically tailored to guarantee that every client’s individual needs are met, and by taking the time to understand our client’s business, we ensure consistently remarkable results. With more than 50 industry-leading lawyers with many years of experience delivering expert advice to some of South Africa’s most sophisticated and successful companies, institutions and private groups, in a variety of legal areas including commercial, litigation, conveyancing, labour, IP and family law, consumer, municipal, criminal law, dispute resolution, we are well placed to advise on all of your legal requirements.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-&-freedman-llc.jpeg
Johnson & Freedman, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schindlers.jpeg
Schindlers Attorneys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Johnson & Freedman, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Schindlers Attorneys
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Freedman, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schindlers Attorneys in 2025.

Incident History — Johnson & Freedman, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Freedman, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Schindlers Attorneys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schindlers Attorneys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-&-freedman-llc.jpeg
Johnson & Freedman, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schindlers.jpeg
Schindlers Attorneys
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Johnson & Freedman, LLC company and Schindlers Attorneys company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Schindlers Attorneys company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Johnson & Freedman, LLC company.

In the current year, Schindlers Attorneys company and Johnson & Freedman, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Schindlers Attorneys company nor Johnson & Freedman, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Schindlers Attorneys company nor Johnson & Freedman, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Schindlers Attorneys company nor Johnson & Freedman, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Johnson & Freedman, LLC company nor Schindlers Attorneys company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Johnson & Freedman, LLC nor Schindlers Attorneys holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Johnson & Freedman, LLC company nor Schindlers Attorneys company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Schindlers Attorneys company employs more people globally than Johnson & Freedman, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Johnson & Freedman, LLC nor Schindlers Attorneys holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Johnson & Freedman, LLC nor Schindlers Attorneys holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Johnson & Freedman, LLC nor Schindlers Attorneys holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Johnson & Freedman, LLC nor Schindlers Attorneys holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Johnson & Freedman, LLC nor Schindlers Attorneys holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Johnson & Freedman, LLC nor Schindlers Attorneys holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X