Comparison Overview

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

VS

Lehigh Valley Health Network

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

1 Johnson and Johnson Plaza, New Brunswick, New Jersey, US, 08901
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://thenext.jnjmedtech.com

At Johnson & Johnson MedTech, we are working to solve the world’s most pressing healthcare challenges through innovations at the intersection of biology and technology. With deep expertise in surgery, orthopaedics, cardiovascular, and vision, we design healthcare solutions that are smarter, less invasive and more personalized. We are developing the next generation of med tech solutions to tackle the most pervasive and complex health challenges for people around the world.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 36,750
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Lehigh Valley Health Network

1200 S Cedar Crest Blvd, Allentown, Pennsylvania, US, 18103
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lvhn.org

Lehigh Valley Health Network, part of Jefferson Health, is proud to be part of a leading integrated academic health care delivery system. Together, we’re among the top 15 not-for-profit health systems in the U.S., with 65,000 colleagues, 32 hospitals and more than 700 sites of care across eastern Pennsylvania and southern New Jersey. We’re committed to putting people first and pursuing excellence in over 95 clinical specialties, supported by a national doctoral research university and an expanded not-for-profit health plan.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,958
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-&-johnson-medtech.jpeg
Johnson & Johnson MedTech
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lvhn.jpeg
Lehigh Valley Health Network
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Johnson & Johnson MedTech
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lehigh Valley Health Network
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson MedTech in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lehigh Valley Health Network in 2026.

Incident History — Johnson & Johnson MedTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson MedTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lehigh Valley Health Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lehigh Valley Health Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-&-johnson-medtech.jpeg
Johnson & Johnson MedTech
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lvhn.jpeg
Lehigh Valley Health Network
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Johnson & Johnson MedTech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lehigh Valley Health Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lehigh Valley Health Network company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Johnson & Johnson MedTech company.

In the current year, Lehigh Valley Health Network company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lehigh Valley Health Network company nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lehigh Valley Health Network company nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lehigh Valley Health Network company nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech company nor Lehigh Valley Health Network company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lehigh Valley Health Network company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Johnson & Johnson MedTech company.

Johnson & Johnson MedTech company employs more people globally than Lehigh Valley Health Network company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References