Comparison Overview

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

VS

Dasa

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

1 Johnson and Johnson Plaza, New Brunswick, New Jersey, US, 08901
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At Johnson & Johnson MedTech, we are working to solve the world’s most pressing healthcare challenges through innovations at the intersection of biology and technology. With deep expertise in surgery, orthopaedics, cardiovascular, and vision, we design healthcare solutions that are smarter, less invasive and more personalized. We are developing the next generation of med tech solutions to tackle the most pervasive and complex health challenges for people around the world.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 34,798
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dasa

Av das Nações Unidas 7815, São Paulo, undefined, 05425-070, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

A Dasa é a maior rede de saúde integrada do Brasil. Faz parte da vida de mais de 20 milhões de pessoas por ano, com alta tecnologia, experiência intuitiva e atitude à frente do tempo. Com mais de 50 mil colaboradores e 250 mil médicos parceiros, existe para ser a saúde que as pessoas desejam e que o mundo precisa, estando presente em cada etapa de cuidado. Acredita que para cuidar sempre é preciso cuidar por inteiro. Por isso, olha para a gestão da saúde de um jeito preventivo, preditivo e personalizado. Integra medicina diagnóstica, hospitais, genômica, oncologia, coordenação de cuidado, pronto atendimento, telemedicina, pesquisa clínica e ciência. Ao todo, conta com 15 hospitais referências (considerando rede própria, crescimentos inorgânicos e os deals que ainda estão sob aprovação dos órgãos reguladores), e mais de 59 marcas entre medicina diagnóstica e hospitais, distribuídas em mais de 900 unidades no Brasil. A Dasa garante uma navegação ágil, descomplicada e sem atritos na jornada da saúde, tanto para pacientes quanto para médicos, por meio da sua plataforma de gestão, o Nav. Além disso, oferece soluções integradas e inovadoras de saúde corporativa, por meio do Dasa Empresas. Somos Dasa e somos para toda a vida. Para mais informações, acesse: www.dasa.com.br

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 31,786
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-&-johnson-medtech.jpeg
Johnson & Johnson MedTech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dasa.jpeg
Dasa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Johnson & Johnson MedTech
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dasa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson MedTech in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dasa in 2025.

Incident History — Johnson & Johnson MedTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson MedTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dasa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dasa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-&-johnson-medtech.jpeg
Johnson & Johnson MedTech
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dasa.jpeg
Dasa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Johnson & Johnson MedTech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dasa company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dasa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Johnson & Johnson MedTech company.

In the current year, Dasa company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dasa company nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dasa company nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dasa company nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech company nor Dasa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Dasa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Johnson & Johnson MedTech company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dasa company.

Johnson & Johnson MedTech company employs more people globally than Dasa company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Dasa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Dasa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Dasa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Dasa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Dasa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech nor Dasa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H