Comparison Overview

The Johns Hopkins University

VS

University of Waterloo

The Johns Hopkins University

3400 N Charles St, Mason Hall, Baltimore, MD, US, 21218-2688
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

We are America’s first research university, founded in 1876 on the principle that by pursuing big ideas and sharing what we learn, we can make the world a better place. For more than 140 years, our faculty and students have worked side by side in pursuit of discoveries that improve lives. Johns Hopkins enrolls more than 24,000 full- and part-time students throughout nine academic divisions. Our faculty and students study, teach, and learn across more than 260 programs in the arts and music, the humanities, the social and natural sciences, engineering, international studies, education, business, and the health professions.The university has four campuses in Baltimore; one in Washington, D.C.; one in Montgomery County, Maryland; and facilities throughout the Baltimore-Washington region as well as in China and Italy. The university takes its name from 19th-century Maryland philanthropist Johns Hopkins, an entrepreneur who believed in improving public health and education in Baltimore and beyond.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 17,735
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

University of Waterloo

200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, CA, N2L 3G1
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 800 and 849

University of Waterloo is a leader in innovation that drives economic and social prosperity for Canada and the world. We are home to a renowned talent pipeline, game-changing research and technology, and unmatched entrepreneurial culture, that together create solutions to tackle today’s and tomorrow’s challenges. Our greatest impact happens together. A strategic integration of research and teaching excellence, the world’s largest co-operative education program, entrepreneurship-intensive programs, and creator-owned IP, has resulted in extensive industry collaboration, the generation of thousands of commercial and social enterprises, and a dynamic learning experience for more than 41,000 undergraduate and graduate students.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,421
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johns-hopkins-university.jpeg
The Johns Hopkins University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uwaterloo.jpeg
University of Waterloo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Johns Hopkins University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Waterloo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Johns Hopkins University in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Waterloo in 2026.

Incident History — The Johns Hopkins University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Johns Hopkins University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Waterloo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Waterloo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johns-hopkins-university.jpeg
The Johns Hopkins University
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uwaterloo.jpeg
University of Waterloo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Johns Hopkins University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Waterloo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, University of Waterloo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Johns Hopkins University company.

In the current year, University of Waterloo company and The Johns Hopkins University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Waterloo company nor The Johns Hopkins University company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Waterloo company nor The Johns Hopkins University company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Waterloo company nor The Johns Hopkins University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Johns Hopkins University company nor University of Waterloo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Johns Hopkins University nor University of Waterloo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Waterloo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Johns Hopkins University company.

The Johns Hopkins University company employs more people globally than University of Waterloo company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither The Johns Hopkins University nor University of Waterloo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Johns Hopkins University nor University of Waterloo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Johns Hopkins University nor University of Waterloo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Johns Hopkins University nor University of Waterloo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Johns Hopkins University nor University of Waterloo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Johns Hopkins University nor University of Waterloo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H