Comparison Overview

Johns Hopkins Medicine

VS

Fresenius Group

Johns Hopkins Medicine

600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, US, 21231
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Johns Hopkins Medicine is a governing structure for the University’s School of Medicine and the health system, coordinating their research, teaching, patient care, and related enterprises. The Johns Hopkins Hospital opened in 1889, followed four years later by the university’s School of Medicine, revolutionizing medical practice, teaching, and research in the United States. The hospital is now part of the Johns Hopkins Health System, which includes two other acute-care hospitals and additional integrated health-care delivery components, with a network of primary and specialty care practices throughout Maryland, outpatient care, long-term care, and home care. The Johns Hopkins University opened in 1876 as America’s first research university, founded for the express purpose of expanding knowledge and putting that knowledge to work for the good of humanity. Two Interconnected Institutions: Over the years, the University and Hospital have grown, and—sometimes jointly, sometimes separately—they have created affiliated organizations. The Johns Hopkins Institutions is a collective name for the University and the Johns Hopkins Health System. The Johns Hopkins University includes nine academic and research divisions, and numerous centers, institutes, and affiliated entities. Johns Hopkins Medicine is a governing structure for the University’s School of Medicine and the health system, coordinating their research, teaching, patient care, and related enterprises.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 38,244
Subsidiaries: 25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Fresenius Group

Else-Kröner-Straße 1, Bad Homburg, 61352, DE
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

Committed to Life - We save and improve human lives with affordable, accessible, and innovative healthcare products and the highest quality in clinical care. Fresenius is a global healthcare company headquartered in Bad Homburg v. d. Höhe, Germany. In fiscal year 2024, Fresenius generated €21.5 billion in annual revenue with around 176,000 employees (excluding Fresenius Medical Care). As a healthcare company focused on therapy, Fresenius offers system-critical products and services for leading therapies for the care of critically and chronically ill patients. Why work for Fresenius? At Fresenius, your career has purpose. As a global healthcare group, we’re dedicated to improving the lives of millions through better medicine—and we’re looking for people who want to make a real impact. Whether you’re an engineer, nurse, scientist, or business expert, Fresenius offers diverse career opportunities, the chance to grow across disciplines, and the satisfaction of contributing to something that truly matters. ➡ Learn more: careers.fresenius.com ➡ Follow us on Instagram: www.instagram.com/fresenius.group Imprint: https://www.fresenius.com/Imprint Data protection: https://www.fresenius.com/data-protection

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,612
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johns-hopkins-medicine.jpeg
Johns Hopkins Medicine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fresenius-se.jpeg
Fresenius Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Johns Hopkins Medicine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fresenius Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johns Hopkins Medicine in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fresenius Group in 2026.

Incident History — Johns Hopkins Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johns Hopkins Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fresenius Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fresenius Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johns-hopkins-medicine.jpeg
Johns Hopkins Medicine
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fresenius-se.jpeg
Fresenius Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Computer virus outbreak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Fresenius Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Johns Hopkins Medicine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Johns Hopkins Medicine and Fresenius Group have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Fresenius Group company and Johns Hopkins Medicine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Fresenius Group company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Johns Hopkins Medicine company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Johns Hopkins Medicine company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Fresenius Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fresenius Group company nor Johns Hopkins Medicine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Johns Hopkins Medicine company nor Fresenius Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Johns Hopkins Medicine nor Fresenius Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Johns Hopkins Medicine company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fresenius Group company.

Johns Hopkins Medicine company employs more people globally than Fresenius Group company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Johns Hopkins Medicine nor Fresenius Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Johns Hopkins Medicine nor Fresenius Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Johns Hopkins Medicine nor Fresenius Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Johns Hopkins Medicine nor Fresenius Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Johns Hopkins Medicine nor Fresenius Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Johns Hopkins Medicine nor Fresenius Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H