Comparison Overview

Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods

VS

Brosnan Golf

Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Since its inception in 1967, Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods has become one of the largest independent, family-owned team sports dealers operating within the Midwest. There are currenty five locations within the St. Louis Metro Area, as well as divisions in Springfield (MO), Lansing (MI) & Detroit (MI). Johnny Mac's remains focused solely on team sports - baseball, basketball, football, hockey, lacrosse, soccer, swimming, track, volleyball, wrestling, etc. - and supplies athletes with equipment, accessories, apparel, awards and support services. John A. McArthur (aka Johnny Mac) established the very first Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods store with his wife Eleanor on historic Route 66 to serve local athletes participating in team sports. McArthur appreciated the opportunities team sports provided him as a youth and valued the life lessons he received as a result of his involvement. As a respected sports official & umpire, McArthur maintained strong ties to the local community and made it his mission to provide athletes with the equipment and support services required to succeed.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brosnan Golf

19 Radley St, 19 Radley St
Last Update: 2025-11-21

For over four decades, Brosnan Golf has proudly crafted a legacy of excellence in the Australian golfing scene. Our journey began in 1977 with a simple mission: to create exceptional golf products that inspire golfers to unleash their true potential. Today, we stand tall as a trusted brand offering a comprehensive range of premium golf products, including club packages and sets, buggies, shoes, balls, and accessories. Our rich history adds immense value and credibility, symbolising our unwavering commitment to quality, performance, and innovation.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnny-mac's-sporting-goods.jpeg
Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brosnan-golf-australia-pty-ltd.jpeg
Brosnan Golf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brosnan Golf
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brosnan Golf in 2025.

Incident History — Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brosnan Golf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brosnan Golf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnny-mac's-sporting-goods.jpeg
Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brosnan-golf-australia-pty-ltd.jpeg
Brosnan Golf
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Brosnan Golf company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Brosnan Golf company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods company.

In the current year, Brosnan Golf company and Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brosnan Golf company nor Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brosnan Golf company nor Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brosnan Golf company nor Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods company nor Brosnan Golf company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods nor Brosnan Golf holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods company nor Brosnan Golf company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods company employs more people globally than Brosnan Golf company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods nor Brosnan Golf holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods nor Brosnan Golf holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods nor Brosnan Golf holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods nor Brosnan Golf holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods nor Brosnan Golf holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Johnny Mac's Sporting Goods nor Brosnan Golf holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H