Comparison Overview

John Lewis & Partners

VS

H&M

John Lewis & Partners

171 Victoria Street, London, England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jlpjobs.com

Since 1864 we've been delighting customers with our quality products and renowned customer service. We put happiness at the heart of everything we do. We our one brand under the John Lewis Partnership umbrella. A unique way of doing business where all of our Partners (employees) share ownership of the company. We’re on a journey, an ongoing experiment to find happier, more trusted ways of doing business and all of our Partners have a part to play. By joining the Partnership you’ll be joining a different kind of business. One that seeks to make a difference, not just to its Partners, but to the lives of everyone. It’s this shared purpose that drives us. Guides us. And we believe that by working together, in Partnership, we can help create a place with happier people, for a happier business and a happier world. #FindYourHappier #DrivenByPurpose

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 12,129
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

H&M

Vasagatan 7, Stockholm, Stockholm County, SE, 111 20
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849
https://career.hm.com/

At H&M, we welcome you to be yourself and feel like you truly belong. Help us reimagine the future of an entire industry by making everyone look, feel, and do good. We take pride in our history of making fashion accessible to everyone and led by our values we strive to build a more welcoming, inclusive, and sustainable industry. We are privileged to have more than 120,000 colleagues, in over 75 countries across the world. That’s 120 000 individuals with unique experiences, skills, and passions. At H&M, we believe everyone can make an impact, we believe in giving people responsibility and a strong sense of ownership. Our business is your business, and when you grow, we grow.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 67,647
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnlewisandpartners.jpeg
John Lewis & Partners
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/h&m.jpeg
H&M
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
John Lewis & Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
H&M
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for John Lewis & Partners in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for H&M in 2025.

Incident History — John Lewis & Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

John Lewis & Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — H&M (X = Date, Y = Severity)

H&M cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnlewisandpartners.jpeg
John Lewis & Partners
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/h&m.jpeg
H&M
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

H&M company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to John Lewis & Partners company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, H&M company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to John Lewis & Partners company.

In the current year, H&M company and John Lewis & Partners company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither H&M company nor John Lewis & Partners company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither H&M company nor John Lewis & Partners company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither H&M company nor John Lewis & Partners company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither John Lewis & Partners company nor H&M company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither John Lewis & Partners nor H&M holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

H&M company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to John Lewis & Partners company.

H&M company employs more people globally than John Lewis & Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither John Lewis & Partners nor H&M holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither John Lewis & Partners nor H&M holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither John Lewis & Partners nor H&M holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither John Lewis & Partners nor H&M holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither John Lewis & Partners nor H&M holds HIPAA certification.

Neither John Lewis & Partners nor H&M holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Framework prior to versions 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x display the full server stack trace when encountering an error within the GetCdfResource servlet.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Editor plugin versions before 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x, deserialize untrusted JSON data without constraining the parser to approved classes and methods.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The impacted element is an unknown function in the library /ctcms/libs/Ct_Config.php of the component Backend System Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument Cj_Add/Cj_Edit results in code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The affected element is the function Save of the file /ctcms/libs/Ct_App.php of the component Backend App Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument CT_App_Paytype leads to code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15, it was possible to accept an invitation opened by a different user. Version 5.15. contains a patch. As a workaround, avoid leaving one's Weblate sessions with an invitation opened unattended.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References