Comparison Overview

John W. Danforth Company

VS

VINCI Construction France

John W. Danforth Company

300 Colvin Woods Parkway, Tonawanda, NY, 14150, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

We are powered by the best people in the industry. We are a rarity in that our cutting edge solutions sit on a foundation dating back to 1884. Whether it’s a high-rise orifice, hospital, manufacturing plant, date center, convention center or a ski resort, we do more than build systems. We engineer efficiency. As one of the largest contractors in the Northeast, we are known for • Installation of heating ventilation, air conditioning, and plumbing systems. Design and build services •Custom sheet metal and pipe fabrication •Energy Performance Contracting •Comprehensive maintenance programs Fine Tuned Designs Created for You. No Compromises.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 376
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

VINCI Construction France

Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Héritier d'une lignée d'entreprises prestigieuses et numéro 1 français du BTP, VINCI Construction France met à la disposition des donneurs d'ordres publics et des opérateurs privés ses savoir-faire d'entreprise générale et d'ensemblier, son modèle d'organisation local-global, les ressources de ses 473 agences réparties sur tout le territoire et le professionnalisme de ses 24 000 collaborateurs pour concevoir, financer, réaliser et exploiter tout projet de construction. VINCI Construction France intervient en France dans les métiers du bâtiment, du génie civil, de l'hydraulique et des métiers de spécialité. VINCI Construction France se différencie par sa capacité unique à prendre en charge des projets complexes, y compris leur financement, grâce aux synergies de métiers développées au sein de VINCI.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 10,303
Subsidiaries: 165
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-w--danforth-company.jpeg
John W. Danforth Company
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci-construction-france.jpeg
VINCI Construction France
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
John W. Danforth Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VINCI Construction France
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for John W. Danforth Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI Construction France in 2025.

Incident History — John W. Danforth Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

John W. Danforth Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VINCI Construction France (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI Construction France cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-w--danforth-company.jpeg
John W. Danforth Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci-construction-france.jpeg
VINCI Construction France
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both John W. Danforth Company company and VINCI Construction France company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, VINCI Construction France company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to John W. Danforth Company company.

In the current year, VINCI Construction France company and John W. Danforth Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither VINCI Construction France company nor John W. Danforth Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither VINCI Construction France company nor John W. Danforth Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither VINCI Construction France company nor John W. Danforth Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither John W. Danforth Company company nor VINCI Construction France company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

VINCI Construction France company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to John W. Danforth Company company.

VINCI Construction France company employs more people globally than John W. Danforth Company company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the token’s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victim’s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victim’s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victim’s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victim’s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X