Comparison Overview

John W. Danforth Company

VS

Skanska

John W. Danforth Company

300 Colvin Woods Parkway, Tonawanda, NY, 14150, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

We are powered by the best people in the industry. We are a rarity in that our cutting edge solutions sit on a foundation dating back to 1884. Whether itโ€™s a high-rise orifice, hospital, manufacturing plant, date center, convention center or a ski resort, we do more than build systems. We engineer efficiency. As one of the largest contractors in the Northeast, we are known for โ€ข Installation of heating ventilation, air conditioning, and plumbing systems. Design and build services โ€ขCustom sheet metal and pipe fabrication โ€ขEnergy Performance Contracting โ€ขComprehensive maintenance programs Fine Tuned Designs Created for You. No Compromises.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 376
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Skanska

Warfvinges vรคg 25 (Group Headquarters), Stockholm, undefined, SE-112 74, SE
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Moderate

Between 600 and 700

Skanska Group uses knowledge & foresight to shape the way people live, work, and connect. More than 135 years in the making, weโ€™re one of the worldโ€™s largest development and construction companies, with 2020 revenue totaling SEK 159 billion. We operate in select markets throughout the Nordics, Europe and the United States. Together with our customers and the collective expertise of our 32,000+ teammates, we create innovative and sustainable solutions that support healthy living beyond our lifetime. Founded in Sweden in 1887 as a maker of concrete, we were driven by a dual purpose: to innovate and build whatโ€™s good for people and society. Today we develop, design and build everything from healthy and green office buildings to smart homes and infrastructure. We partner to innovate, and we continue to hold our founding values at the heart of everything we do. Skanska Linkedin Page House Rules We welcome and encourage participation. However, there are some rules we ask everyone to follow in order to maintain a friendly and respectful community. We will remove any posted content that is not aligned with Skanska's values and Code of Conduct, including: Text, images or video containing profanity, sexually graphic or offensive language, spam, illegal content โ€“ laws that govern the use of copyrights, trade secrets, etc. will be followed.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 22,985
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-w--danforth-company.jpeg
John W. Danforth Company
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skanska.jpeg
Skanska
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
John W. Danforth Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Skanska
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for John W. Danforth Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Skanska in 2025.

Incident History โ€” John W. Danforth Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

John W. Danforth Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Skanska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Skanska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-w--danforth-company.jpeg
John W. Danforth Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skanska.jpeg
Skanska
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

John W. Danforth Company company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Skanska company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Skanska company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to John W. Danforth Company company.

In the current year, Skanska company and John W. Danforth Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Skanska company nor John W. Danforth Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Skanska company nor John W. Danforth Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Skanska company nor John W. Danforth Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither John W. Danforth Company company nor Skanska company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither John W. Danforth Company company nor Skanska company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Skanska company employs more people globally than John W. Danforth Company company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X