Comparison Overview

John Stokes Financial

VS

Citi

John Stokes Financial

2040 Main Street, Suite 570, Irvine, 92614, US
Last Update: 2026-01-16

At John Stokes Financial, we specialize in providing financial advice to individuals who are undergoing significant life and job transitions, such as job loss and retirement. We understand that these periods of change can be both exciting and challenging, and we are here to guide you every step of the way. Our goal is to help you navigate these transitions to ensure financial clarity and to never leave money on the table. Whether you are starting a new chapter, embarking on a new career path, or retiring after a successful career, our team is dedicated to helping you achieve your financial goals and secure a prosperous future. Please see my website for additional information and disclosure. Third party comments may not be representative of all customer experiences.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Citi

388 Greenwich Street, New York, 10013, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

Citi's mission is to serve as a trusted partner to our clients by responsibly providing financial services that enable growth and economic progress. Our core activities are safeguarding assets, lending money, making payments and accessing the capital markets on behalf of our clients. We have over 200 years of experience helping our clients meet the world's toughest challenges and embrace its greatest opportunities. We are Citi, the global bank – an institution connecting millions of people across hundreds of countries and cities. For information on Citi’s commitment to privacy, visit on.citi/privacy.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 200,467
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-stokes-financial.jpeg
John Stokes Financial
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/citi.jpeg
Citi
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
John Stokes Financial
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Citi
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for John Stokes Financial in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Citi in 2026.

Incident History — John Stokes Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

John Stokes Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Citi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Citi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-stokes-financial.jpeg
John Stokes Financial
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/citi.jpeg
Citi
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Accidental Exposure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Citi company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to John Stokes Financial company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Citi company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to John Stokes Financial company.

In the current year, Citi company and John Stokes Financial company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Citi company nor John Stokes Financial company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Citi company and John Stokes Financial company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Citi company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while John Stokes Financial company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither John Stokes Financial company nor Citi company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither John Stokes Financial nor Citi holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Citi company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to John Stokes Financial company.

Citi company employs more people globally than John Stokes Financial company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither John Stokes Financial nor Citi holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither John Stokes Financial nor Citi holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither John Stokes Financial nor Citi holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither John Stokes Financial nor Citi holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither John Stokes Financial nor Citi holds HIPAA certification.

Neither John Stokes Financial nor Citi holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H