Comparison Overview

JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED

VS

Taylor RyMar Corporation

JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED

Unit 1, 202-214 Milperra Road, Milperra, New South Wales, 2214, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.johnsamplegroup.com

John Sample Group is a highly diversified family company, with commercial interests that extend into markets both locally, and across the world. The John Sample Group operates out of a head office facility which is located in Sydney. This site provides a hub for all warehousing, as well as the core of our employee group. Our commercial trading is currently focused on our wholesale business JSG Industrial Systems, which provides quality industrial solutions to a variety of industrial & natural resource sectors in Oceania, Asia and Africa. We have regional offices strategically positioned in Australia, New Zealand, Indonesia, Singapore and South Africa ensuring that local support is provided to all of our customers, wherever it is needed. The family portfolio now includes a number of international operations and joint ventures including PT Intecs which operates out of Jakarta in Indonesia and International Engineered Products (IEP) which is located in Cape Town South Africa. Today, around the world, the Sample family is proud to employ over 700 staff.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Taylor RyMar Corporation

60 East Rio Salado Parkway, Tempe, Arizona, 85281, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tr-corp.com

Taylor RyMar Corporation is a multi-discipline engineering and design firm providing electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering services. TRC has three core divisions: Vertical Engineering and Design, provides complete design and construction administration services for mechanical, electrical, plumbing & fire protection building systems; Renewable Energy Engineering, provides photovoltaic systems engineering and consulting, and solar hot water systems design; Energy Services, provides a complete range of energy services consulting and engineering including commissioning and energy auditing. TRC has offices in Tempe, AZ and Flagstaff, AZ. Our professional staff includes registered engineers, LEED® Accredited professionals, certified commissioning agents, and auditing professionals. Our focus on providing exceptional service and exceeding client expectations has allowed TRC the opportunity to work with a highly regarded clientele and continues to open doors for new opportunities. TRC maintains several strategic alliances with other design professionals, giving us the capability to provide a seamless full service design package if advantageous to our client/owner. We have found these strategic alliances and partnering to give the owner the best final product by bringing together a team of the most competent and qualified individuals for the specific project.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-sample-group-pty-limited.jpeg
JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-rymar-corporation.jpeg
Taylor RyMar Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Taylor RyMar Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taylor RyMar Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Taylor RyMar Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taylor RyMar Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-sample-group-pty-limited.jpeg
JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-rymar-corporation.jpeg
Taylor RyMar Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED company and Taylor RyMar Corporation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Taylor RyMar Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED company.

In the current year, Taylor RyMar Corporation company and JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Taylor RyMar Corporation company nor JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Taylor RyMar Corporation company nor JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Taylor RyMar Corporation company nor JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED company nor Taylor RyMar Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED company nor Taylor RyMar Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED company employs more people globally than Taylor RyMar Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JOHN SAMPLE GROUP PTY. LIMITED nor Taylor RyMar Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References