Comparison Overview

John Reed & Son

VS

Padma's Plantation

John Reed & Son

141 Regent Street, Kettering, England, NN16 8, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.johnreedandsonupholsterers.com/

John Reed and Sons are leading Master Upholsterers and furniture restorers, experts in providing private and commercial upholstery. As a family run business established in 1972 and now in its third generation we have solid history of supporting our customers on a range of projects from the restoration of family heirlooms to creating bespoke seating areas for local businesses.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Padma's Plantation

391 Wegner, West Chicago, IL 60185, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.padmasplantation.com

Padma's Plantation is a nature-inspired company that focuses on crafting furniture of natural materials including renewable resources like bamboo, rattan, and abaca to create fine furniture and accessories that evoke the tropics and all it entails. Like the easy-going, laid back style enjoyed by those who live in warm climates, Padma's Plantation designs are casual and comfortable.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-reed-son.jpeg
John Reed & Son
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/padma's-plantation.jpeg
Padma's Plantation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
John Reed & Son
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Padma's Plantation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for John Reed & Son in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Padma's Plantation in 2025.

Incident History — John Reed & Son (X = Date, Y = Severity)

John Reed & Son cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Padma's Plantation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Padma's Plantation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-reed-son.jpeg
John Reed & Son
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/padma's-plantation.jpeg
Padma's Plantation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

John Reed & Son company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Padma's Plantation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Padma's Plantation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to John Reed & Son company.

In the current year, Padma's Plantation company and John Reed & Son company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Padma's Plantation company nor John Reed & Son company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Padma's Plantation company nor John Reed & Son company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Padma's Plantation company nor John Reed & Son company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither John Reed & Son company nor Padma's Plantation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither John Reed & Son nor Padma's Plantation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither John Reed & Son company nor Padma's Plantation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Padma's Plantation company employs more people globally than John Reed & Son company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither John Reed & Son nor Padma's Plantation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither John Reed & Son nor Padma's Plantation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither John Reed & Son nor Padma's Plantation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither John Reed & Son nor Padma's Plantation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither John Reed & Son nor Padma's Plantation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither John Reed & Son nor Padma's Plantation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References