Comparison Overview

John Murray

VS

Local Profile

John Murray

Carmelite House, London, EC4Y 0DZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

For nearly a quarter of a millennium, John Murray has been unashamedly populist, publishing the absorbing, provocative, commercial and exciting. Seven generations of John Murrays fostered genius and found readers in vast numbers, until in 2002 the firm became a division of Hachette, under the umbrella of Hodder & Stoughton. From selling volumes of Byron to massed crowds from the window of the old Albemarle Street offices (the premises are still owned by the Murray family and used as a venue), to publishing Jane Austen, Charles Darwin and Queen Victoria and making John Betjeman the nation's favourite poet, John Murray has always published great writing for a wide audience. John Murray has always been at the forefront of innovative publishing:

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Local Profile

1413 Gables Court, Plano, 75075, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Local Profile of Collin County connects our communities, leveraging the incredible power of print, digital and events to tell the stories that drive meaningful conversation and action, bringing us closer together. Join us as we explore all the incredible things, people, and stories our local community has to offer. Explore Local. Be Local. Love Local.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-murray.jpeg
John Murray
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/localprofile.jpeg
Local Profile
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
John Murray
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Local Profile
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for John Murray in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Local Profile in 2025.

Incident History — John Murray (X = Date, Y = Severity)

John Murray cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Local Profile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Local Profile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-murray.jpeg
John Murray
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/localprofile.jpeg
Local Profile
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

John Murray company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Local Profile company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Local Profile company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to John Murray company.

In the current year, Local Profile company and John Murray company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Local Profile company nor John Murray company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Local Profile company nor John Murray company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Local Profile company nor John Murray company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither John Murray company nor Local Profile company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither John Murray nor Local Profile holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

John Murray company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Local Profile company.

John Murray company employs more people globally than Local Profile company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither John Murray nor Local Profile holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither John Murray nor Local Profile holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither John Murray nor Local Profile holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither John Murray nor Local Profile holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither John Murray nor Local Profile holds HIPAA certification.

Neither John Murray nor Local Profile holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.