Comparison Overview

John C. Stennis Institute of Government

VS

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission

John C. Stennis Institute of Government

382 Hardy Rd, Starkville, Mississippi, 39762, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.sig.msstate.edu/

The John C. Stennis Institute of Government performs a threefold mission: (1) to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of Mississippi state and local governments through basic and applied research, training, technical assistance, and service; (2) to provide technical assistance and research for both rural development in Mississippi and regional activities in the Southeast; and (3) to promote civic education and citizen involvement in the political process.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission

GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849
http://www.transformingchildmaintenance.org.uk

The Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission is a new organisation established by the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008, following an in-depth review of child maintenance policy and delivery arrangements in this country. The Commission is responsible for the child maintenance system in Great Britain. The Commission’s key objective is to maximise the number of effective child maintenance arrangements that are in place, whether private or statutory. To achieve this aim, the Commission provides an information and support service (Child Maintenance Options) and oversees the statutory maintenance service currently run by the Child Support Agency. Over time, the Commission will improve arrangements for the assessment, collection and enforcement of child maintenance for parents using that service. The Commission is a crown Non-Departmental Public Body, which means it operates at arms length from Government, enabling it to innovate and provide services how and through the mechanisms it chooses. With this new structure, we have an opportunity to deliver a new system of child maintenance in Great Britain that really works for separated families.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 110
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-c.-stennis-institute-of-government.jpeg
John C. Stennis Institute of Government
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
John C. Stennis Institute of Government
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for John C. Stennis Institute of Government in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission in 2025.

Incident History — John C. Stennis Institute of Government (X = Date, Y = Severity)

John C. Stennis Institute of Government cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-c.-stennis-institute-of-government.jpeg
John C. Stennis Institute of Government
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to John C. Stennis Institute of Government company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to John C. Stennis Institute of Government company.

In the current year, Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company and John C. Stennis Institute of Government company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company nor John C. Stennis Institute of Government company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company nor John C. Stennis Institute of Government company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company nor John C. Stennis Institute of Government company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither John C. Stennis Institute of Government company nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither John C. Stennis Institute of Government nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither John C. Stennis Institute of Government company nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company employs more people globally than John C. Stennis Institute of Government company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither John C. Stennis Institute of Government nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither John C. Stennis Institute of Government nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither John C. Stennis Institute of Government nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither John C. Stennis Institute of Government nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither John C. Stennis Institute of Government nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither John C. Stennis Institute of Government nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References