Comparison Overview

Joe Pizik Electric

VS

Tata Projects

Joe Pizik Electric

375 Oliver Dr, Troy, Michigan 48084-5433, US
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)

Excellent

None

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tata Projects

14th - 15th Floor, Cignus, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400087, IN
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Tata Projects is one of the most admired Technology led Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) companies in India. We have expertise in providing sustainable solutions in the execution of large and complex urban and industrial infrastructure projects while also demonstrating strong presence in refineries and petrochemical plants. We leverage our domain knowledge across various business segments to address the shift to clean energy to meet the nationโ€™s Net Zero ambitions. We provide ready-to-deploy solutions for semiconductor facilities, giga factories, data centres, refineries, green fuels, roads, bridges, integrated rail & metro systems, commercial building & airports, power generation, transmission & distribution systems, chemical process plants, water & waste management, and mining & metal purification systems. Tata Projects offers one stop service covering entire life cycle of the project, from project conceptualization to operations & maintenance. It uses innovative technology solutions to offer bouquet of services which includes engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning, inspection & expediting, operations, repairs & maintenance, and shutdown services. Over the years, Tata Projects has received several awards and recognitions for its project delivery and commitment to safety & quality. We are a part of the TATA Group which operates in more than 100 countries across six continents, with a mission โ€˜To improve the quality of life of the communities we serve globally, through long-term stakeholder value creation based on Leadership with Trustโ€™. In 2023-24, the revenue of Tata companies, taken together, was $165Billion. These companies collectively employ over 10,00,000 people. *Caution against fraudulent job offers*: Tata Projects does not charge/accept any amount or security deposit from job seekers during the selection process or while inviting candidates for an interview. To know more visit - www.tata.com/jobalert

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 18,778
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Joe Pizik Electric
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-projects.jpeg
Tata Projects
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Joe Pizik Electric
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tata Projects
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joe Pizik Electric in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Projects in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Joe Pizik Electric (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joe Pizik Electric cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Tata Projects (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Projects cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Joe Pizik Electric
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-projects.jpeg
Tata Projects
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Joe Pizik Electric company and Tata Projects company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Tata Projects company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Joe Pizik Electric company.

In the current year, Tata Projects company and Joe Pizik Electric company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tata Projects company nor Joe Pizik Electric company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tata Projects company nor Joe Pizik Electric company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tata Projects company nor Joe Pizik Electric company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Joe Pizik Electric company nor Tata Projects company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Joe Pizik Electric company nor Tata Projects company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tata Projects company employs more people globally than Joe Pizik Electric company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MinIO is a high-performance object storage system. In all versions prior to RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z, a privilege escalation vulnerability allows service accounts and STS (Security Token Service) accounts with restricted session policies to bypass their inline policy restrictions when performing operations on their own account, specifically when creating new service accounts for the same user. The vulnerability exists in the IAM policy validation logic where the code incorrectly relied on the DenyOnly argument when validating session policies for restricted accounts. When a session policy is present, the system should validate that the action is allowed by the session policy, not just that it is not denied. An attacker with valid credentials for a restricted service or STS account can create a new service account for itself without policy restrictions, resulting in a new service account with full parent privileges instead of being restricted by the inline policy. This allows the attacker to access buckets and objects beyond their intended restrictions and modify, delete, or create objects outside their authorized scope. The vulnerability is fixed in version RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy. Envoy versions earlier than 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, and 1.33.12 contain a use-after-free vulnerability in the Lua filter. When a Lua script executing in the response phase rewrites a response body so that its size exceeds the configured per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (default 1MB), Envoy generates a local reply whose headers override the original response headers, leaving dangling references and causing a crash. This results in denial of service. Updating to versions 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, or 1.33.12 fixes the issue. Increasing per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (and for HTTP/2 the initial_stream_window_size) or increasing per_request_buffer_limit_bytes / request_body_buffer_limit can reduce the likelihood of triggering the condition but does not correct the underlying memory safety flaw.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in a CMap, via the "UseCMap" entry, leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in NucleoidAI Nucleoid up to 0.7.10. The impacted element is the function extension.apply of the file /src/cluster.ts of the component Outbound Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument https/ip/port/path/headers leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to a credential leakage which could allow an attacker to access other computers or applications.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N