Comparison Overview

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

VS

Takeda

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

None
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://innovativemedicine.jnj.com/

At Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, we innovate with purpose, to lead where medicine is going. The experiences of patients around the world inform and inspire our science-based innovations, which continue to change and save lives. Applying rigorous science with compassion, we confidently address the most complex diseases of our time and develop the potential medicines of tomorrow. We are continuously working to develop treatments, aspiring to find cures, pioneering the path from lab to life, and championing patients every step of the way. https://bit.ly/3reuMvK

NAICS: 3254
NAICS Definition: Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees: 37,729
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Takeda

Tokyo, JP
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849
https://www.takeda.com/

We strive to transform lives. While the science we advance is constantly evolving, our core purpose is enduring. For more than two centuries, our values have guided us to do what’s right for patients and for society. We know that changing lives requires us to do things differently. We start by listening to and addressing what really matters to patients, the people who love them, and those in the healthcare system who provide care. And that’s what inspires us all to be bold, push boundaries and set new standards that open up greater opportunities. Read our community guidelines: https://takeda.info/communityguidelines

NAICS: 3254
NAICS Definition: Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees: 37,228
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jnjinnovativemedicine.jpeg
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/takeda-pharmaceuticals.jpeg
Takeda
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Takeda
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine in 2026.

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Takeda in 2026.

Incident History — Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Takeda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Takeda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jnjinnovativemedicine.jpeg
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/takeda-pharmaceuticals.jpeg
Takeda
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Takeda company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Takeda company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company has not reported any.

In the current year, Takeda company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Takeda company nor Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Takeda company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Takeda company nor Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company nor Takeda company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine nor Takeda holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Takeda company.

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company employs more people globally than Takeda company, reflecting its scale as a Pharmaceutical Manufacturing.

Neither Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine nor Takeda holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine nor Takeda holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine nor Takeda holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine nor Takeda holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine nor Takeda holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine nor Takeda holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References